<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Memo: U.S. Hopes to Cut Force in Iraq in Half by Early 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/british_memo_us_hopes_to_cut_force_in_iraq_in_half_by_early_2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/british_memo_us_hopes_to_cut_force_in_iraq_in_half_by_early_2006/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:46:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/british_memo_us_hopes_to_cut_force_in_iraq_in_half_by_early_2006/comment-page-1/#comment-51217</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11264#comment-51217</guid>
		<description>You people seem to think that reporters are somehow sneaking through our most secure installations, snatching up classified documents like James-frickin-Bond. You do realize, don&#039;t you, that someone with access to that info has to actually _do_ the leaking in the first place, before the reporter ever has to decide whether or not to publish?

I&#039;m not saying reporters have no responsibilities here, but if you&#039;re gonna scold one side of the equation, you might want to look at the other side, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people seem to think that reporters are somehow sneaking through our most secure installations, snatching up classified documents like James-frickin-Bond. You do realize, don't you, that someone with access to that info has to actually _do_ the leaking in the first place, before the reporter ever has to decide whether or not to publish?</p>
<p>I'm not saying reporters have no responsibilities here, but if you're gonna scold one side of the equation, you might want to look at the other side, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldilocks</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/british_memo_us_hopes_to_cut_force_in_iraq_in_half_by_early_2006/comment-page-1/#comment-51207</link>
		<dc:creator>baldilocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11264#comment-51207</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Little More Treachery&lt;/strong&gt;

Right on cue for Monday? U.K. Memo Cites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Little More Treachery</strong></p>
<p>Right on cue for Monday? U.K. Memo Cites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/british_memo_us_hopes_to_cut_force_in_iraq_in_half_by_early_2006/comment-page-1/#comment-51201</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11264#comment-51201</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;My question is: what classified document, what secret memo would be too classified or too secret for a journalist?&lt;/em&gt;

Perhaps you should ask right-wing hero David Horowitz who, as editor of left-wing Ramparts magazine in his strident left-winger days in the early &#039;70&#039;s, published highly sensitive information about satellite codes that was extremely helpful to the Russians.

Now, though he should probably still be in prison, he&#039;s a great icon of the right-wing.  Strange, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>My question is: what classified document, what secret memo would be too classified or too secret for a journalist?</em></p>
<p>Perhaps you should ask right-wing hero David Horowitz who, as editor of left-wing Ramparts magazine in his strident left-winger days in the early '70's, published highly sensitive information about satellite codes that was extremely helpful to the Russians.</p>
<p>Now, though he should probably still be in prison, he's a great icon of the right-wing.  Strange, isn't it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EMT907</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/british_memo_us_hopes_to_cut_force_in_iraq_in_half_by_early_2006/comment-page-1/#comment-51184</link>
		<dc:creator>EMT907</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11264#comment-51184</guid>
		<description>I think that the left either has a hard time understanding the idea of contigency plans or they&#039;re well aware of it, but will use anything they can get their hands on for a &quot;gotcha&quot;, even if they look stupid in the process.
As far as journalists publishing classified documents, I don&#039;t think they really care. If they can hold it up and bash Bush or Blair, that&#039;s all the justification they need. Seems treasonous to me to leak and publish classified documents, but I know you can&#039;t accuse liberals of being treasonous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the left either has a hard time understanding the idea of contigency plans or they're well aware of it, but will use anything they can get their hands on for a "gotcha", even if they look stupid in the process.<br />
As far as journalists publishing classified documents, I don't think they really care. If they can hold it up and bash Bush or Blair, that's all the justification they need. Seems treasonous to me to leak and publish classified documents, but I know you can't accuse liberals of being treasonous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeWaun</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/british_memo_us_hopes_to_cut_force_in_iraq_in_half_by_early_2006/comment-page-1/#comment-51183</link>
		<dc:creator>DeWaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11264#comment-51183</guid>
		<description>My question is: what classified document, what secret memo would be &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;too&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; classified or &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;too&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; secret for a journalist? It&#039;s like journalist has become snitching on every little thing.

&lt;strong&gt;When will national security mean something to journalists?&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is: what classified document, what secret memo would be <em><strong>too</strong></em> classified or <em><strong>too</strong></em> secret for a journalist? It's like journalist has become snitching on every little thing.</p>
<p><strong>When will national security mean something to journalists?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
