<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BUSH AND THE BASE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_and_the_base/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_and_the_base/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:36:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OF Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_and_the_base/comment-page-1/#comment-11537</link>
		<dc:creator>OF Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4849#comment-11537</guid>
		<description>Doc, I&#039;ve just come to terms with the idea that The Bush Extravagance that many to the right of myself are angry about isn&#039;t half as bad as the Extravagance that a Dem president would have.

Now, what I wonder about is whether the &quot;Bush is a RW Ideologue&quot; meme folks do it because they want more (or everything) or if it is because it&#039;s Bush in the office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, I've just come to terms with the idea that The Bush Extravagance that many to the right of myself are angry about isn't half as bad as the Extravagance that a Dem president would have.</p>
<p>Now, what I wonder about is whether the "Bush is a RW Ideologue" meme folks do it because they want more (or everything) or if it is because it's Bush in the office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_and_the_base/comment-page-1/#comment-11538</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4849#comment-11538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking &quot;both.&quot;

I&#039;ve never heard a liberal complain about too much spending except in the Pentagon. And when the Cold War ended where did liberals want the &quot;peace dividend&quot; (savings from reduced defense spending) to go?

Those who guessed &quot;the taxpayers&quot;, please toggle SARCASM OFF. Leaving it on is kinda like not turning off your turn signal on the highway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm thinking "both."</p>
<p>I've never heard a liberal complain about too much spending except in the Pentagon. And when the Cold War ended where did liberals want the "peace dividend" (savings from reduced defense spending) to go?</p>
<p>Those who guessed "the taxpayers", please toggle SARCASM OFF. Leaving it on is kinda like not turning off your turn signal on the highway...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad DeLong</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_and_the_base/comment-page-1/#comment-11539</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad DeLong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4849#comment-11539</guid>
		<description>Bush&#039;s domestic policy is not so much &#039;left&#039; or &#039;right&#039; as simply incompetent. The deficit provides perhaps the best register of the degree of incompetence, after all.

I am not by nature tremendously partisan: I could get very enthusiastic about, say, a broaden-the-base-and-lower-the-rates tax policy. I could get enthusiastic about a &quot;privatization&quot; of Social Security that would stop Congress treating Social Security revenues as the equivalent of general revenues to be spent on today&#039;s programs.

But that&#039;s not what we have on offer, is it?



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush's domestic policy is not so much 'left' or 'right' as simply incompetent. The deficit provides perhaps the best register of the degree of incompetence, after all.</p>
<p>I am not by nature tremendously partisan: I could get very enthusiastic about, say, a broaden-the-base-and-lower-the-rates tax policy. I could get enthusiastic about a "privatization" of Social Security that would stop Congress treating Social Security revenues as the equivalent of general revenues to be spent on today's programs.</p>
<p>But that's not what we have on offer, is it?</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
