Comments on: BUSH BUSINESS CYCLE http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_business_cycle/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:06:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Paul http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_business_cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-8280 Paul Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=3945#comment-8280 Step 1: Retrieve dead horse Step 2: Beat it. And THAT is why I said over a year ago and have said repeatedly since then, that the Dems running against the economy 2 or 3 years out was patently foolish. All they did was tell the voters that Bush was responsible for a great economy. Step 1: Retrieve dead horse

Step 2: Beat it.

And THAT is why I said over a year ago and have said repeatedly since then, that the Dems running against the economy 2 or 3 years out was patently foolish.

All they did was tell the voters that Bush was responsible for a great economy.

]]> By: Insults Unpunished http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_business_cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-8281 Insults Unpunished Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=3945#comment-8281 <strong>It's The Economy, Stupid</strong> Cycling to 2004 (washingtonpost.com) I generally agree with Robert Samuelson -- and mostly do here as well -- but I have one minor quibble: the first President Bush wasn't voted out because the economy was in the dumps, he was... --- It's The Economy, Stupid
Cycling to 2004 (washingtonpost.com) I generally agree with Robert Samuelson -- and mostly do here as well -- but I have one minor quibble: the first President Bush wasn't voted out because the economy was in the dumps, he was...

---

]]>