<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BUSH DIDN&#8217;T LIE, PART III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_didnt_lie_part_iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_didnt_lie_part_iii/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:33:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_didnt_lie_part_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-3585</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2631#comment-3585</guid>
		<description>Daniel Drezner makes a hell of a point. Or should I say he did a hell of a job making it.

But it does not matter. The people who opposed the liberation of the oppressed people of Iraq are still opposed it to.

Not because they were against war or it was the wrong thing to do. Indeed, many of these poeple are now arguing that we should be in Liberia. They opposed it because it was Bush&#039;s idea. Right after the Dems embarrassed themselves after the last midterm election, they announced openly that they were going to oppose Bush more and Iraq was one of the things they were going to oppose him on.

IT IS PATHETIC AND SAD that a once great (or at least mediocre) party has now chosen as a political strategy to play politics while we have soldiers at war.

To the administration and most Republicans this is about making the world a safer place. To Democratic leadership this is about the acquisition of power. And that is just is pathetic.

Paul

And it is an unarguable point. After the election they said that they were going to do it to regain power. Now they are doing it. Don&#039;t blame me for repeating their words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Drezner makes a hell of a point. Or should I say he did a hell of a job making it.</p>
<p>But it does not matter. The people who opposed the liberation of the oppressed people of Iraq are still opposed it to.</p>
<p>Not because they were against war or it was the wrong thing to do. Indeed, many of these poeple are now arguing that we should be in Liberia. They opposed it because it was Bush's idea. Right after the Dems embarrassed themselves after the last midterm election, they announced openly that they were going to oppose Bush more and Iraq was one of the things they were going to oppose him on.</p>
<p>IT IS PATHETIC AND SAD that a once great (or at least mediocre) party has now chosen as a political strategy to play politics while we have soldiers at war.</p>
<p>To the administration and most Republicans this is about making the world a safer place. To Democratic leadership this is about the acquisition of power. And that is just is pathetic.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
<p>And it is an unarguable point. After the election they said that they were going to do it to regain power. Now they are doing it. Don't blame me for repeating their words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_didnt_lie_part_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2631#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>Congrat&#039;s knocking down the straw man.  That crude drawing of the anti-war position works just like a voodoo doll.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrat's knocking down the straw man.  That crude drawing of the anti-war position works just like a voodoo doll.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
