<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Using Straw-Man Arguments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:46:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bol</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-76827</link>
		<dc:creator>Bol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/#comment-76827</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does President Bush try to score cheap political points in his speeches by painting the views of the opposition in ways in unfavorable ways? Sure.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This was part of his plan on &quot;bringing honor and dignity back to the White House.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does President Bush try to score cheap political points in his speeches by painting the views of the opposition in ways in unfavorable ways? Sure.</p></blockquote>
<p>This was part of his plan on "bringing honor and dignity back to the White House."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unalienable Right &#187; AP peddling unvarnished partisan hit piece as &#8220;news&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-76749</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unalienable Right &#187; AP peddling unvarnished partisan hit piece as &#8220;news&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/#comment-76749</guid>
		<description>[...] Others: Riehl World View Sister Toldjah Outside the Beltway  posted by: The Editors @ 7:30 pm March 18, 2006 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Others: Riehl World View Sister Toldjah Outside the Beltway  posted by: The Editors @ 7:30 pm March 18, 2006 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogus Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-76745</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogus Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/#comment-76745</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Associated Press Isn&#039;t Even Trying To Hide It Anymore...&lt;/strong&gt;

Actual AP Headline:

&quot;Bush Using Straw-Man Arguments in Speeches&quot;

Becau......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Associated Press Isn't Even Trying To Hide It Anymore...</strong></p>
<p>Actual AP Headline:</p>
<p>"Bush Using Straw-Man Arguments in Speeches"</p>
<p>Becau......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QandO - Free Markets, Free People</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-127511</link>
		<dc:creator>QandO - Free Markets, Free People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/bush_using_straw-man_arguments/#comment-127511</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; News: Bad Response: At a minimum, the Associated Press should do two things here: Issue corrections for the blatantly inaccurate (&quot;some&quot; do say Iraq is &quot;lost&quot;) and/or misleading (&quot;hardly anyone&quot; isnot different than &quot;some&quot;) claims made by Loven. Label further such stories &quot;analysis&quot; or &quot;opinion&quot;, rather than straight news. I’m actually of the opinion that, done well, stories like these can be a valuable addition to our news atmosphere. I&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> News: Bad Response: At a minimum, the Associated Press should do two things here: Issue corrections for the blatantly inaccurate ("some" do say Iraq is "lost") and/or misleading ("hardly anyone" isnot different than "some") claims made by Loven. Label further such stories "analysis" or "opinion", rather than straight news. I&rsquo;m actually of the opinion that, done well, stories like these can be a valuable addition to our news atmosphere. I<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
