<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada Defenseless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:49:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14336</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14336</guid>
		<description>&quot;Everything about you guys are awesome. Hell, I want to be an American. Why wouldn&#039;t I want to be represented by a president who chokes on a pretzel watching TV?&quot;

Comrade, their President&#039;s party isn&#039;t being investigated for funneling public funds into Quebec based Liberal donors, and the average citizen in the US enjoys a standard of living 25% higher than the average citizen in Canada - so please do shut the f*ck up while you&#039;re still behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Everything about you guys are awesome. Hell, I want to be an American. Why wouldn't I want to be represented by a president who chokes on a pretzel watching TV?"</p>
<p>Comrade, their President's party isn't being investigated for funneling public funds into Quebec based Liberal donors, and the average citizen in the US enjoys a standard of living 25% higher than the average citizen in Canada - so please do shut the f*ck up while you're still behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StarBanker</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14337</link>
		<dc:creator>StarBanker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14337</guid>
		<description>Canada no longer has an independent military and hasn&#039;t for quite some time. For all their high falutin talk of deployments they rely on the United States for nearly all their logistical support. You didn&#039;t really think that Air Canada flies in their artillery or armored personel carriers? Think of the Canadian Armed Forces as a foriegn version of Vermont National Guard with 1960&#039;s equipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada no longer has an independent military and hasn't for quite some time. For all their high falutin talk of deployments they rely on the United States for nearly all their logistical support. You didn't really think that Air Canada flies in their artillery or armored personel carriers? Think of the Canadian Armed Forces as a foriegn version of Vermont National Guard with 1960's equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Boness</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14338</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Boness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14338</guid>
		<description>Paul Martin was given a report from the School of Policy Studies at Queen&#039;s University last November on the state of Canada&#039;s military. The one word executive summary of the report is &quot;bleak.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Martin was given a report from the School of Policy Studies at Queen's University last November on the state of Canada's military. The one word executive summary of the report is "bleak."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary and the Samoyeds</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14339</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary and the Samoyeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14339</guid>
		<description>I remember in the 80s all the wailing &quot;for the cost of just one B-1 bomber we can feed 12,000 hungry children.&quot;  &quot;For just one MX missile, we can build 4800 homes.&quot;  

Repeat that enough and you have Canada.  The difference is that no one would rescue us from such folly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember in the 80s all the wailing "for the cost of just one B-1 bomber we can feed 12,000 hungry children."  "For just one MX missile, we can build 4800 homes."  </p>
<p>Repeat that enough and you have Canada.  The difference is that no one would rescue us from such folly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sortapundit</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14340</link>
		<dc:creator>Sortapundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14340</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Canada&#039;s Vanishing Military&lt;/strong&gt;
If this is true we&#039;ll get to watch an interesting experiment. Can a major nation successfully protect its interests without a military force? It&#039;s a mistake to believe that the sole purpose of a nation&#039;s armed forces is purely offensive. Naval Forces...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Canada's Vanishing Military</strong><br />
If this is true we'll get to watch an interesting experiment. Can a major nation successfully protect its interests without a military force? It's a mistake to believe that the sole purpose of a nation's armed forces is purely offensive. Naval Forces...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: small dead animals</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14341</link>
		<dc:creator>small dead animals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14341</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Canadian Military Spending: 2004&lt;/strong&gt;
Our allies in the WOT are going to be rocked back on their heels by the military spending increases in today&#039;s 2004 budget. An additional $250 million over two years for peacekeeping missions in Afghanistan and the fight against terrorism....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Canadian Military Spending: 2004</strong><br />
Our allies in the WOT are going to be rocked back on their heels by the military spending increases in today's 2004 budget. An additional $250 million over two years for peacekeeping missions in Afghanistan and the fight against terrorism....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inoperable Terran</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14342</link>
		<dc:creator>Inoperable Terran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14342</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The next Europe?&lt;/strong&gt;
At current spending levels, Canada will have no military in less than 10 years. Guess we can annex it scot-free then, eh?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The next Europe?</strong><br />
At current spending levels, Canada will have no military in less than 10 years. Guess we can annex it scot-free then, eh?...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalblog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14343</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14343</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Common Goods&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner has a piece on the vanishing Canadian military. It seems like &quot;defense&quot; is in many ways a common good, much like street lighting, at least as the US does it. The fact is, the US would never allow...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Common Goods</strong><br />
James Joyner has a piece on the vanishing Canadian military. It seems like "defense" is in many ways a common good, much like street lighting, at least as the US does it. The fact is, the US would never allow...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Director Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14330</link>
		<dc:creator>Director Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14330</guid>
		<description>Canada defense?  Come on, if anything really bad happened they would come crying to their big neigbor to the south to PLEAASSEEE save us, sort like the Europeans do from time to time.

We should just take a short cut and annex the provinces that are interested (i.e. nearly all except Quebec), add a few more stars to the flag, and be done with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada defense?  Come on, if anything really bad happened they would come crying to their big neigbor to the south to PLEAASSEEE save us, sort like the Europeans do from time to time.</p>
<p>We should just take a short cut and annex the provinces that are interested (i.e. nearly all except Quebec), add a few more stars to the flag, and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Friendly Neighbor</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14331</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Friendly Neighbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14331</guid>
		<description>Its great that you yanks are so well educated and believe that your super military will always protect you. Your military, after taking over Afghanistan, can&#039;t even track down an old man on dialysis. But I mean, he&#039;s able to avoid all of the super high tech gear you have because he can hide in caves. Guess you dont want to get your boots dirty since that means you&#039;ll have to push your debt even higher to get new ones huh?

Everything about you guys are awesome. Hell, I want to be an American. Why wouldn&#039;t I want to be represented by a president who chokes on a pretzel watching TV? 

Now that&#039;s leadership for you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its great that you yanks are so well educated and believe that your super military will always protect you. Your military, after taking over Afghanistan, can't even track down an old man on dialysis. But I mean, he's able to avoid all of the super high tech gear you have because he can hide in caves. Guess you dont want to get your boots dirty since that means you'll have to push your debt even higher to get new ones huh?</p>
<p>Everything about you guys are awesome. Hell, I want to be an American. Why wouldn't I want to be represented by a president who chokes on a pretzel watching TV? </p>
<p>Now that's leadership for you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFire</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14332</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14332</guid>
		<description>Re: YFN

In your case, we really don&#039;t have a choice.  When my next door neighbor&#039;s house is about to burst into flame due to his insistent on using gasoline as lawn sprinkler, I have no choice but to intervent if only to protect my own property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: YFN</p>
<p>In your case, we really don't have a choice.  When my next door neighbor's house is about to burst into flame due to his insistent on using gasoline as lawn sprinkler, I have no choice but to intervent if only to protect my own property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14333</link>
		<dc:creator>keith taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14333</guid>
		<description>Canada don&#039;t need a military anyway, and the money saved can fund their universal healthcare.  Bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada don't need a military anyway, and the money saved can fund their universal healthcare.  Bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14334</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14334</guid>
		<description>You would think with that much extra money that they  already have for universal health care that there care would be faster and better than there curren poor state of service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think with that much extra money that they  already have for universal health care that there care would be faster and better than there curren poor state of service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/canada_defenseless/comment-page-1/#comment-14335</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5543#comment-14335</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Canada defense? Come on, if anything really bad happened they would come crying to their big neigbor to the south to PLEAASSEEE save us, sort like the Europeans do from time to time.&lt;/i&gt;

Yup. And afterward, they&#039;d never forgive us for saving them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Canada defense? Come on, if anything really bad happened they would come crying to their big neigbor to the south to PLEAASSEEE save us, sort like the Europeans do from time to time.</i></p>
<p>Yup. And afterward, they'd never forgive us for saving them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
