<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Candidate Spin Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/candidate_spin_spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/candidate_spin_spam/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:25:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/candidate_spin_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-269970</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/candidate_spin_spam/#comment-269970</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think Michael is referring to the fact that the image extends down into the next post.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks.  Oddly, it doesn&#039;t on my screen and I use fairly large resolution.  But, apparently, with very large resolution, it does.

Michael suggested a fix offline that I&#039;m having Ed look into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think Michael is referring to the fact that the image extends down into the next post.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks.  Oddly, it doesn't on my screen and I use fairly large resolution.  But, apparently, with very large resolution, it does.</p>
<p>Michael suggested a fix offline that I'm having Ed look into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Prather</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/candidate_spin_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-269861</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Prather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/candidate_spin_spam/#comment-269861</guid>
		<description>James,

I think Michael is referring to the fact that the image extends down into the next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>I think Michael is referring to the fact that the image extends down into the next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/candidate_spin_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-269620</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/candidate_spin_spam/#comment-269620</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Large images like that really screw with the page formatting.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What are you seeing?  In both Firefox and IE, it&#039;s displaying fine for me.   I keep image sizes under 600 pixels so that they don&#039;t expand the middle column; this one&#039;s 427.

Usually, I specify an image size by a width= command but it doesn&#039;t work well for text-intensive images, so I just cropped it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Large images like that really screw with the page formatting.</p></blockquote>
<p>What are you seeing?  In both Firefox and IE, it's displaying fine for me.   I keep image sizes under 600 pixels so that they don't expand the middle column; this one's 427.</p>
<p>Usually, I specify an image size by a width= command but it doesn't work well for text-intensive images, so I just cropped it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/candidate_spin_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-269611</link>
		<dc:creator>FireWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/candidate_spin_spam/#comment-269611</guid>
		<description>Hell James, if it works for spammers why not campaign activists? 

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell James, if it works for spammers why not campaign activists? </p>
<p>;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/candidate_spin_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-269609</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/candidate_spin_spam/#comment-269609</guid>
		<description>Large images like that really screw with the page formatting.  Have whomever is maintaining the site&#039;s design add a &quot;clear: both&quot; style attribute to an element after the article, that should fix it.

http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_classification.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Large images like that really screw with the page formatting.  Have whomever is maintaining the site's design add a "clear: both" style attribute to an element after the article, that should fix it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_classification.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_classification.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
