<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caroline Kennedy’s Nanny Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:17:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-686987</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=30438#comment-686987</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Now we know why wealthy Democrats support soaking the rich. Increasing the tax rate when they don&#039;t pay their taxes at the current rates doesn&#039;t affect them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/nyregion/23caroline.html?_r=1&amp;hp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Ms. Kennedy’s only tax issue on the public record appeared to be a $615 city tax lien that she settled in 1994&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hell, I owed about that much meownself once when I made an error in addition on my federal tax return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now we know why wealthy Democrats support soaking the rich. Increasing the tax rate when they don't pay their taxes at the current rates doesn't affect them.</p></blockquote>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/nyregion/23caroline.html?_r=1&amp;hp" rel="nofollow">New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ms. Kennedy&rsquo;s only tax issue on the public record appeared to be a $615 city tax lien that she settled in 1994</p></blockquote>
<p>Hell, I owed about that much meownself once when I made an error in addition on my federal tax return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-682388</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=30438#comment-682388</guid>
		<description>What is it with wealthy Democrats...that they can&#039;t stop driving their cars and flying their planes to stop &#039;global warming&#039; yet want everyone else to?

What is it with wealthy Democrats...that they believe in global warming at all even when the science says their idiots?

What is it with wealthy Democrats...that want to help the poor and downtrodden but are only willing to give up tiny portions of their wealth toward the effort?  

What is it with wealthy Democrats...that they want to be protected but are pacifists? 

What is it with wealthy Democrats...that they [insert here]?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it with wealthy Democrats...that they can't stop driving their cars and flying their planes to stop 'global warming' yet want everyone else to?</p>
<p>What is it with wealthy Democrats...that they believe in global warming at all even when the science says their idiots?</p>
<p>What is it with wealthy Democrats...that want to help the poor and downtrodden but are only willing to give up tiny portions of their wealth toward the effort?  </p>
<p>What is it with wealthy Democrats...that they want to be protected but are pacifists? </p>
<p>What is it with wealthy Democrats...that they [insert here]?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-682386</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=30438#comment-682386</guid>
		<description>Good god, James, you are right - the editing was bad for that article. No literate, college-educated english-speaker and writer (never mind a native) should have written such an abomination. 

Hey, New York Times editors, if you&#039;re reading this blog per chance, try it &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; way next time.

1. Caroline Kennedy withdrew from the Senate
2. She confirmed it at X point in time
3. She said there were personal matters involved
4. There may have been tax issues involved
5. The Governor had shown some misgivings - he denies this.
6. END</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good god, James, you are right - the editing was bad for that article. No literate, college-educated english-speaker and writer (never mind a native) should have written such an abomination. </p>
<p>Hey, New York Times editors, if you're reading this blog per chance, try it <em>this</em> way next time.</p>
<p>1. Caroline Kennedy withdrew from the Senate<br />
2. She confirmed it at X point in time<br />
3. She said there were personal matters involved<br />
4. There may have been tax issues involved<br />
5. The Governor had shown some misgivings - he denies this.<br />
6. END</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKB</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-681980</link>
		<dc:creator>JKB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=30438#comment-681980</guid>
		<description>Now we know why wealthy Democrats support soaking the rich.  Increasing the tax rate when they don&#039;t pay their taxes at the current rates doesn&#039;t affect them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we know why wealthy Democrats support soaking the rich.  Increasing the tax rate when they don't pay their taxes at the current rates doesn't affect them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-681666</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=30438#comment-681666</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What is it with incredibly wealthy Democratic aspirants to high office that they can’t pay their damn taxes?!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From what i&#039;ve been able to gather....tax &quot;hiccups&quot; happen and they are nothing worth throwing in the towel. Worst case, she waits till the IRS audits her and she at least partially squares up. This is a shocker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What is it with incredibly wealthy Democratic aspirants to high office that they can&rsquo;t pay their damn taxes?!</p></blockquote>
<p>From what i've been able to gather....tax "hiccups" happen and they are nothing worth throwing in the towel. Worst case, she waits till the IRS audits her and she at least partially squares up. This is a shocker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-679297</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=30438#comment-679297</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s pretty hard to find a fact in there. The speculation is entirely plausible--&#039;truthy&#039;, if you will--but signally lacked by any factual presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it's pretty hard to find a fact in there. The speculation is entirely plausible--'truthy', if you will--but signally lacked by any factual presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/caroline_kennedys_nanny_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-679294</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=30438#comment-679294</guid>
		<description>Only for a Kennedy would not paying taxes for the help be a face saving way out of the problem of her general incoherence and limited accomplishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only for a Kennedy would not paying taxes for the help be a face saving way out of the problem of her general incoherence and limited accomplishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
