<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CHANGING REGIMES LIKE SOCKS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/changing_regimes_like_socks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/changing_regimes_like_socks/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:49:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/changing_regimes_like_socks/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1400#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Gee whiz--if SOB-edness was sufficient for military-directed regime change, we would be busy for a while.

That having been said, I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing the guy gone.

However, James is correct--the military option is not and should not be, option 1.  This is a far different case than Iraq.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee whiz--if SOB-edness was sufficient for military-directed regime change, we would be busy for a while.</p>
<p>That having been said, I wouldn't mind seeing the guy gone.</p>
<p>However, James is correct--the military option is not and should not be, option 1.  This is a far different case than Iraq.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
