But thanks for the link! (And it's good that you've warned your readers who might follow it.)

As far as the policy arguments: I understand your arguments that both the OVP and the Executive Office of the President personnel ought to be subject to the scrutiny of this reporting (or the discipline that the scrutiny would in theory help encourage). I just don't have a handle on the relative frequency of leaks or inadvertent disclosures from those folks as opposed to genuine Title 5 "agency" folks, nor any sense of how much of a burden compliance would impose on the relatively leaner, meaner cadres there at the top. I'm just not in a position to disagree with you on the policy issue, but rather, only to point out that rightly or wrongly, the POTUS and VPOTUS, as you concede, have differed with you.

(Ironically, the order also requires the Director to gather data on each agency's costs in complying, presumably to report the the POTUS so he can evaluate, on an on-going basis, whether its benefits justify those costs — and the Director's also complaining that Cheney and the OVP won't hand over that information either!)

Why do they call briefs, briefs?

Because when they fall down it's embarrassing?