<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Products Unsafe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/chinese_products_unsafe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/chinese_products_unsafe/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:37:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/chinese_products_unsafe/comment-page-1/#comment-133638</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/06/chinese_products_unsafe/#comment-133638</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This is exactly what happened in the this country in the latter half of the 19th century before food and drug regulations were passed despite the fact that property rights and &quot;other rights&quot; were fairly well spelled out.&lt;/i&gt;

Word.  Maybe China is the great new libertarian hope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This is exactly what happened in the this country in the latter half of the 19th century before food and drug regulations were passed despite the fact that property rights and "other rights" were fairly well spelled out.</i></p>
<p>Word.  Maybe China is the great new libertarian hope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick DeMent</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/chinese_products_unsafe/comment-page-1/#comment-133634</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick DeMent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/06/chinese_products_unsafe/#comment-133634</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I wonder if this isn&#039;t inevitable when you try to separate property rights from other rights?&lt;/em&gt;

I wonder if this isn&#039;t inevitable when the goal is to make as much money as you can for shareholders? This is exactly what happened in the this country in the latter half of the 19th century before food and drug regulations were passed despite the fact that property rights and &quot;other rights&quot; were fairly well spelled out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I wonder if this isn't inevitable when you try to separate property rights from other rights?</em></p>
<p>I wonder if this isn't inevitable when the goal is to make as much money as you can for shareholders? This is exactly what happened in the this country in the latter half of the 19th century before food and drug regulations were passed despite the fact that property rights and "other rights" were fairly well spelled out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent G. Budge</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/chinese_products_unsafe/comment-page-1/#comment-133623</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent G. Budge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/06/chinese_products_unsafe/#comment-133623</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The irony is that China has managed to combine the worst elements of capitalism with the worst elements of Communism:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wonder if this isn&#039;t inevitable when you try to separate property rights from other rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The irony is that China has managed to combine the worst elements of capitalism with the worst elements of Communism:</p></blockquote>
<p>I wonder if this isn't inevitable when you try to separate property rights from other rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/chinese_products_unsafe/comment-page-1/#comment-133510</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/06/chinese_products_unsafe/#comment-133510</guid>
		<description>What a useless effing Reuters article ... how about LINKING TO THE RECALL NOTICE?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19213392/?GT1=10056&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The MSNBC article&lt;/a&gt; at least lists the recalled toys, tho of course, do I still have the packaging the toy came in?  Of course not.

Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://recalls.rc2.com/recalls_Wood_0607.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the recall notice&lt;/a&gt;.

And the cough-syrup story scared the hell out of me.  Guess how many bottles of kids&#039; cough syrup at Wal-Mart say what country they&#039;re made in?  None, on my last visit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a useless effing Reuters article ... how about LINKING TO THE RECALL NOTICE?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19213392/?GT1=10056" rel="nofollow">The MSNBC article</a> at least lists the recalled toys, tho of course, do I still have the packaging the toy came in?  Of course not.</p>
<p>Here's <a href="http://recalls.rc2.com/recalls_Wood_0607.html" rel="nofollow">the recall notice</a>.</p>
<p>And the cough-syrup story scared the hell out of me.  Guess how many bottles of kids' cough syrup at Wal-Mart say what country they're made in?  None, on my last visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/chinese_products_unsafe/comment-page-1/#comment-133507</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/06/chinese_products_unsafe/#comment-133507</guid>
		<description>As you know, James, I&#039;ve been covering the recall of pet foods made with Chinese-supplied wheat and rice gluten that had been adulterated with melamine and related substances for a couple of months on a daily or near-daily basis.  IMO that this story feeds into protectionist reflexes is a bad byproduct of the story.

There are a number of things to recall:

1)  However bad the situation with unsafe Chinese-made foods, additives, and pharmaceuticals, it&#039;s that much worse in China itself.

2)  There is, for practical purposes, no such thing as an international civil code.

3)  Not all of the fault lies with the Chinese.  Where is the due diligence on the part of U. S. companies?

4)  There are many, many products in which there&#039;s no practical way to wean ourselves from Chinese products.  These include things from vitamins (and vitamin-fortified foods) to computer memories.  Worried about U. S. dependence  for energy?  I&#039;m worried about U. S. dependence on China for computer memories.

What&#039;s the bottom line?  Beats me.  I think that what is needed is country-of-origin labelling for ingredients and serious enforcement thereof but those aren&#039;t even on the agenda.  &lt;b&gt;Of course&lt;/b&gt; companies don&#039;t want to do it.  But I see no other way for consumers to make informed decisions about what they buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know, James, I've been covering the recall of pet foods made with Chinese-supplied wheat and rice gluten that had been adulterated with melamine and related substances for a couple of months on a daily or near-daily basis.  IMO that this story feeds into protectionist reflexes is a bad byproduct of the story.</p>
<p>There are a number of things to recall:</p>
<p>1)  However bad the situation with unsafe Chinese-made foods, additives, and pharmaceuticals, it's that much worse in China itself.</p>
<p>2)  There is, for practical purposes, no such thing as an international civil code.</p>
<p>3)  Not all of the fault lies with the Chinese.  Where is the due diligence on the part of U. S. companies?</p>
<p>4)  There are many, many products in which there's no practical way to wean ourselves from Chinese products.  These include things from vitamins (and vitamin-fortified foods) to computer memories.  Worried about U. S. dependence  for energy?  I'm worried about U. S. dependence on China for computer memories.</p>
<p>What's the bottom line?  Beats me.  I think that what is needed is country-of-origin labelling for ingredients and serious enforcement thereof but those aren't even on the agenda.  <b>Of course</b> companies don't want to do it.  But I see no other way for consumers to make informed decisions about what they buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
