CIA Rains Hellfire on Al Qaeda
A story on the front page of today’s NYT reports on the killing of two very senior al Qaeda officials in Pakistan.
In my New Atlanticist piece “Marriot Bombing Planner Killed in CIA Strike,” I argue that it actually matters this time.
- CIA Rains Hellfire on Al Qaeda
- London Subway Bomber Dead in Pakistan
- Beating Al Qaeda But Losing in Afghanistan?
- Ayman al-Zawahiri Killed in Predator Strike?
- U.S. Strikes Making Taliban Angry
- Hamas Security Chief Killed
- Al Qaeda Getting Stronger
- U.S. Striking Al Qaeda Targets in Pakistan
- Bin Laden Killed in Pakistan!
- Pakistan: Hollow State
- Berlin Wall Fall: 20 Years Later
- Oklahoma High Schoolers Are Very Familiar With George Washington, Thanks
- Was Fort Hood Massacre ‘Terrorism’?
- Making Jobs More Expensive
- House Trades Freedom for Health Coverage, Senate’s Move
- Hasan a Muslim First, American Second?
- OTB Caption JamTM
- Taking “No” As Iran’s Answer
- Update on the Fort Hood Massacre
- OTB Latenight – Soft Cell
"It matters now", James, suggests it didn't before. I'm not so sure of that. At the least, I would suggest looking at it this way; Without all the AQ eliminated previously, this one wouldn't matter so much, either. They coudl simply hand off operations to (Insert mega-Islamic space cadet here) without any real loss. The very reason this one cost them so much is the ones before aren't there to hand off to. That lack of leadership due to previous strikes also tends to explain much about why we're now getting the intel required.
Of course, I have my doubt that trend will continue after the 20th.












