<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisnero Inquiry Finally Ends With Allegations of Cover-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/cisnero_inquiry_finally_ends_with_allegations_of_cover-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/cisnero_inquiry_finally_ends_with_allegations_of_cover-up/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:17:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/cisnero_inquiry_finally_ends_with_allegations_of_cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-71237</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13335#comment-71237</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt; Record Independent Federal Probe Closes&lt;/strong&gt;

 WASHINGTON -- The independent counsel who investigated former Housing Secretary Henry Cisneros char</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Record Independent Federal Probe Closes</strong></p>
<p> WASHINGTON -- The independent counsel who investigated former Housing Secretary Henry Cisneros char</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin's Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/cisnero_inquiry_finally_ends_with_allegations_of_cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-71175</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin's Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13335#comment-71175</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Barrett Report: Is The IRS The Ultimate Def...&lt;/strong&gt;

Through its biased reporting, the New York Times is attempting to &quot;cover up the cover-up&quot;. While the Barrett report will shed some light on alleged obstruction and corruption within the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service under the Clinto...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Barrett Report: Is The IRS The Ultimate Def...</strong></p>
<p>Through its biased reporting, the New York Times is attempting to "cover up the cover-up". While the Barrett report will shed some light on alleged obstruction and corruption within the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service under the Clinto...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: none</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/cisnero_inquiry_finally_ends_with_allegations_of_cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-71168</link>
		<dc:creator>none</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13335#comment-71168</guid>
		<description>&quot;This tactic, which is becoming increasingly widespread, is an abuse of the power of office&quot;

It seems to me that it was only widespread during the Clinton years when we had daily briefs (leaks) about virtually all of the investigations.  Now we have the reverse, no actual investigations being done and when they are, e.g. White House staff being indicted and unless there&#039;s an indictment, no other info is released.  I think that latter is the better approach.  Even though we would all like to know what, say Patrick Fitzgerald has found out, it doesn&#039;t do anyone good to release this kind of statement without charges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"This tactic, which is becoming increasingly widespread, is an abuse of the power of office"</p>
<p>It seems to me that it was only widespread during the Clinton years when we had daily briefs (leaks) about virtually all of the investigations.  Now we have the reverse, no actual investigations being done and when they are, e.g. White House staff being indicted and unless there's an indictment, no other info is released.  I think that latter is the better approach.  Even though we would all like to know what, say Patrick Fitzgerald has found out, it doesn't do anyone good to release this kind of statement without charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
