Clinton Foundation Denies Use of Clinton Photo
 |
James Joyner | Monday, March 5, 2007 |
Bob Novak reports that “The nonprofit Clinton Foundation denied conservative writer R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. permission to use in his new book a photograph taken last year of the Clinton-baiting editor of the American Spectator with the former president at Clinton’s 60th birthday party in Toronto.”
How in the world can a public figure deny someone the use of a photograph someone else owns?
via Taegan Goddard
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Google Apologizes for Michelle Obama Monkey Picture
- No OTB Radio Tonight
- Colleen Blanchard Schuler, RIP
- That’s What I Call A Loophole…
- Obama “Keeping An Eye” On Robots
- Phil Carter Quits Administration
- Census Worker Hanging Suicide, Not Right Wing Murder
- Swine flu is more popular than Dodd
- Paradox of Choice Paradoxically Untrue
- Private Forecasters Support Claim That Stimulus Worked
How in the world can a public figure deny someone the use of a photograph someone else owns?
Novak doesn't get into the contract betweeen Mungal and the Clinton Foundation. It is quite common at these events for the sponsor to hire a photographer simply to take the photo while the sponsor maintains some rights over the photograph.
I recently hired a photographer for a private benefit party and the contract--provided by the photographer, in this case--clearly gave my organization ownership of the images taken during the benefit. It wasn't even something we thought of, to be quite honest. The photographer told us it is a pretty standard contract.
Comments are Closed
