<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coleman Wins Recount, Too, But Race Not Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coleman_wins_recount_too_but_race_not_over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coleman_wins_recount_too_but_race_not_over/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:15:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coleman_wins_recount_too_but_race_not_over/comment-page-1/#comment-533112</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 23:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28349#comment-533112</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He lost the first count, and the second, but somehow is shrewdly convincing people that the election was stolen from him?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, be mindful of whom it is he&#039;s convincing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He lost the first count, and the second, but somehow is shrewdly convincing people that the election was stolen from him?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, be mindful of whom it is he's convincing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustopher</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coleman_wins_recount_too_but_race_not_over/comment-page-1/#comment-532734</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28349#comment-532734</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, if there are still the issue of the precinct with 133 missing ballots to be decided, and five or six thousand challenged ballots, then Coleman hasn&#039;t really won the recount yet, has he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's see, if there are still the issue of the precinct with 133 missing ballots to be decided, and five or six thousand challenged ballots, then Coleman hasn't really won the recount yet, has he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coleman_wins_recount_too_but_race_not_over/comment-page-1/#comment-532678</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28349#comment-532678</guid>
		<description>markm,

What is farcical is your attempt to explain a situation that you do not understand.

The 792 lead is based on NO votes from the disputed precinct being counted - i.e. they have simply not counted that precinct at all until the dispute over the 133 missing ballots is resolved.

Setting aside the 133, Franken leads in that precinct amongst all the other undisputed votes. Thus the margin will shrink down to the &lt;200 range irrespective of what happens with the 133 - once that precinct is counted.

The 6K+ challanged ballots will obviously break one way or the other. The Franken campaign&#039;s best guess (self-interested no doubt) is that they will win enough of the challanges to close the gap and leave them 4 up. 

It is certainly a plausible outcome. And no candidate in their right mind would concede the election before those challenges were examined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>markm,</p>
<p>What is farcical is your attempt to explain a situation that you do not understand.</p>
<p>The 792 lead is based on NO votes from the disputed precinct being counted - i.e. they have simply not counted that precinct at all until the dispute over the 133 missing ballots is resolved.</p>
<p>Setting aside the 133, Franken leads in that precinct amongst all the other undisputed votes. Thus the margin will shrink down to the &lt;200 range irrespective of what happens with the 133 - once that precinct is counted.</p>
<p>The 6K+ challanged ballots will obviously break one way or the other. The Franken campaign's best guess (self-interested no doubt) is that they will win enough of the challanges to close the gap and leave them 4 up. </p>
<p>It is certainly a plausible outcome. And no candidate in their right mind would concede the election before those challenges were examined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coleman_wins_recount_too_but_race_not_over/comment-page-1/#comment-532639</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28349#comment-532639</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Norm Coleman leads Democrat Al Franken by 192 votes&lt;/blockquote&gt;

According the the Minneesoter Secretary of State Coleman leads by 792 votes. Give &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; the 133 &quot;missing&quot; ballot votes to Franken, re-run the numbers through the State abacus and call Coleman the winner by 659 votes (+/-10% for a safety factor)and be done with it.

What a farce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Norm Coleman leads Democrat Al Franken by 192 votes</p></blockquote>
<p>According the the Minneesoter Secretary of State Coleman leads by 792 votes. Give <em>all</em> the 133 "missing" ballot votes to Franken, re-run the numbers through the State abacus and call Coleman the winner by 659 votes (+/-10% for a safety factor)and be done with it.</p>
<p>What a farce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelB</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coleman_wins_recount_too_but_race_not_over/comment-page-1/#comment-532633</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28349#comment-532633</guid>
		<description>He lost the first count, and the second, but somehow is shrewdly convincing people that the election was stolen from him?

Either he is only convincing a very small number of people, or Minnesota has a disproportionate number of innumerate citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He lost the first count, and the second, but somehow is shrewdly convincing people that the election was stolen from him?</p>
<p>Either he is only convincing a very small number of people, or Minnesota has a disproportionate number of innumerate citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
