Conde Nast Closing ‘Portfolio’
 |
James Joyner | Monday, April 27, 2009 |
Jeff Bercovici reports the demise of his own job:
For nearly two years I’ve been covering the media industry’s bad news on this blog, including some that’s hit very close to home. Now it hits closer still: Condé Nast Portfolio is closing.
Our editor in chief, Joanne Lipman, just broke the news to staff, saying the decision had been made “because of financial reasons at Advance,” Condé Nast’s parent company. “It’s not anything that the company wanted to do.” She said she was informed by Condé Nast chairman S.I. Newhouse Jr. this morning of the decision.
Lipman said the magazine is ahead of its business plan on various business metrics, and also noted that it won a National Magazine Award last year after publishing only a handful of issues, a very accomplishment. But a sharp and extended downturn in ad revenue has made success elusive.
And, no, Newhouse did not make the magazine’s list of Worst CEOS Ever.
Advertising is in a horrific crunch period and those of us with business models that rely on advertising dollars are well aware of the fact. Microsoft['s online division] lost $575 million last quarter because of it. Obviously, putting out a glossy print magazine comes with more overhead than running a blog or even an online-only magazine.
Erick Schofeld argues that, even aside from the industry-wide woes, Portfolio’s business model was dubious.
Portfolio saw itself in the same vein as the Fortune magazine of the 1930s, filled with lush photographs and long narratives. But that formula doesn’t work in an age where business is about speed, not leisure or luxury. It also doesn’t work in an age where monthly magazines in general are increasingly challenged by the wealth of instantaneous business news available on the Web. (And you thought the daily newspapers had it tough). Portfolio’s insistence on favoring its print over its Website content also helped to hasten its demise. If you are going to start a magazine these days, the Website has to come first. The magazine companies still don’t realize this simple fact.
That’s probably right.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- Conde Nast Closing ‘Portfolio’
- Atlantic Redesign, Rebrand
- Journalism Online
- Are Conservatives Being Left Out of Web 2.0?
- Microsoft Offers Yahoo $44.6 Billion Buyout
- Sextortion in High School
- Blackwater Softens Logo
- Quote of the Day – Drinking Republicans
- Absolut Redraws USA – Mexico Border
- Deb Gibson Nude in Playboy
- House Trades Freedom for Health Coverage, Senate’s Move
- Hasan a Muslim First, American Second?
- OTB Caption JamTM
- Taking “No” As Iran’s Answer
- Update on the Fort Hood Massacre
- OTB Latenight – Soft Cell
- Caption Contest Winners
- Breaking: Shootings at Fort Hood (Updated)
- Pentagon Expected To Ask For Supplementary War Funding. As Usual.
- Marking the Anniversary of the Embassy Seizure
Is GM and Chrysler and BofA CEO Obama on the list as well?
I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that Microsoft lost money last quarter. They earned $5.4 billion.
You're right, Jeffrey. It's a peculiar diction. They lost revenue in a particular area (online) relative to the same quarter last year. BTW I fixed the link.
Is GM and Chrysler and BofA CEO Obama on the list as well?
Awwwww...you'll get your chance to fire him in a few years...
