Confirming the Munchkins
 |
James Joyner | Friday, March 30, 2007 |
Responding to Mark Kleimain’s complaint that, “Too much of the action [in the U.S. Attorney firing kerfuffle] is in the non-confirmable munchkins like Monica Goodling,” Steven Teles observes,
Congress has the power to classify any executive branch position it wishes to as subject to confirmation. The constitution states that, “the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.” “May” is the operable word. The power to subject inferior officers to confirmation is in fact the most powerful weapon that Congress has against stocking the executive branch with officials whose primary credential is fidelity to the president’s program, rather than a more general competence at governing. Simply threatening to go deeper into the munchkin pile is likely to have wholesome effects, and certainly actually doing it would have unquestionable effects. The real problem is that it already takes a very long time to get a new president’s nominees through the confirmation process–the question is whether we want to make that any worse. But, at the least, it is possible to start with a single department where there are reasons to believe that excessively partisan selection principles are at work, and then see if that gets the message out more broadly.
That’s the natural ebb and flow of the system of checks and balances the Framers put in place. As a practical matter, as Teles suggests, there are too many confirmable appointees already to add many more to the process and presidents have all manner of means at their disposable, to include recess appointments, to circumvent a too-onerous process.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Paradox of Choice Paradoxically Untrue
- Private Forecasters Support Claim That Stimulus Worked
- Entertaining Kids During the Holidays
- How Much Will Escalation Cost?
- No Party of No
- Thought of the Day
- Queer International Studies
- OTB Latenight – r.e.m.
- Krugman on the Debt and Deficits
- A Question About Bonuses and Bailouts
Going 'deeper into the munchkin pile' seems an particularly effective way to ensure that the President is unable to conduct the policies whose conduct he was elected to perform. It's a perfect way to shut down government.
Of course, that works whenever there is an Executive and Congress of separate parties, whatever those parties may be.
Comments are Closed
