<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress to Apologize for Lynching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:13:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48843</link>
		<dc:creator>Donn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48843</guid>
		<description>Who were the 20 Senators who did not co-sponsor the legislation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who were the 20 Senators who did not co-sponsor the legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concernedtexan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48762</link>
		<dc:creator>concernedtexan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48762</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The fact that juries refused to convict whites for the murders of blacks, while unconscionable, was simply considered local business.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, actually this is inaccurate.  The problem was not that the idea of racial politics was foreign to federal lawmakers, but that the south wanted to keep doing what it was doing.  There were a number of anti-lynching bills (and other anti-racism bills such as bills against poll taxes) proposed to congress that could have had majority support, starting in the 1930&#039;s, but they were filibustered by southern representatives.  Strom Thurmond was notorious for this practice (kind of ironic given the current political use of filibusters).  

To underscore the point, some of these same southern congresspeople were very supportive of racist legislation aimed at forcing all states to behave in a certain way toward blacks -- one of the most egregious involved &quot;deportation&quot; to Liberia.

Here is a good site on this whole history:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/struggle_congress2.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The fact that juries refused to convict whites for the murders of blacks, while unconscionable, was simply considered local business.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, actually this is inaccurate.  The problem was not that the idea of racial politics was foreign to federal lawmakers, but that the south wanted to keep doing what it was doing.  There were a number of anti-lynching bills (and other anti-racism bills such as bills against poll taxes) proposed to congress that could have had majority support, starting in the 1930's, but they were filibustered by southern representatives.  Strom Thurmond was notorious for this practice (kind of ironic given the current political use of filibusters).  </p>
<p>To underscore the point, some of these same southern congresspeople were very supportive of racist legislation aimed at forcing all states to behave in a certain way toward blacks -- one of the most egregious involved "deportation" to Liberia.</p>
<p>Here is a good site on this whole history:<br />
<a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/struggle_congress2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/struggle_congress2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: black ambition</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48639</link>
		<dc:creator>black ambition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48639</guid>
		<description>Excuse the typos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse the typos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: black ambition</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48638</link>
		<dc:creator>black ambition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48638</guid>
		<description>I completely disagree. It is the business of Congress to enact legislation that protects ALL of its citizens. This is not a foreign concept in America today, nor was it a foreign concept during that time period. The truth is that our government spent its time, energy, and money protecting one group of people-- white Americans.

It it had been white Americans that were being targeted by hate groups Congress would have responded. 

An apology does nothing, however atleast the government is finally admitting that they purposely facilitated racist practices against American citizens.  

Also, it is not enough to say that only those who actually hung black people in trees are responsible. In reality, it America had a culture of apathy concerning the terrorism that was being committed against blacks. Crowds of Americans would come to see the lynch victims, pose for pictures. In fact, lynchings were advertised in the newspaper. People brought their picnic baskets and children to see the events. Lynching was a community event. And our government new what was going on and did nothing to protect Americans who were black. Why should one group of Americans get more protection from the government than another?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely disagree. It is the business of Congress to enact legislation that protects ALL of its citizens. This is not a foreign concept in America today, nor was it a foreign concept during that time period. The truth is that our government spent its time, energy, and money protecting one group of people-- white Americans.</p>
<p>It it had been white Americans that were being targeted by hate groups Congress would have responded. </p>
<p>An apology does nothing, however atleast the government is finally admitting that they purposely facilitated racist practices against American citizens.  </p>
<p>Also, it is not enough to say that only those who actually hung black people in trees are responsible. In reality, it America had a culture of apathy concerning the terrorism that was being committed against blacks. Crowds of Americans would come to see the lynch victims, pose for pictures. In fact, lynchings were advertised in the newspaper. People brought their picnic baskets and children to see the events. Lynching was a community event. And our government new what was going on and did nothing to protect Americans who were black. Why should one group of Americans get more protection from the government than another?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita Snook</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48593</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Snook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48593</guid>
		<description>Acc to p. 13 of Thomas Sowell&#039;s &quot;Black Rednecks and White Liberals,&quot;  The Violence for which white Southerners became most notorious was lynching.  Like other aspects of the redneck culture, it has been attributed to race...In fact, most lynching victims were white....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acc to p. 13 of Thomas Sowell's "Black Rednecks and White Liberals,"  The Violence for which white Southerners became most notorious was lynching.  Like other aspects of the redneck culture, it has been attributed to race...In fact, most lynching victims were white....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48557</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48557</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not so much of what happened years ago,but the fact that still much has not change. The open minded community has a lot to say about racism. Still,&lt;blockquote&gt; yet, nobody wants to listen...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;WE ARE AMERICA&quot; and no exceptions ,lyching or any type of racist activity should be exceptable anywhere in the United States if we are to really make a difference in the supposive&quot;UNITED&quot;country!&lt;/blockquote&gt; I reckon, we all do something about it! and, fast!don&#039;t you?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not so much of what happened years ago,but the fact that still much has not change. The open minded community has a lot to say about racism. Still,<br />
<blockquote> yet, nobody wants to listen...</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>"WE ARE AMERICA" and no exceptions ,lyching or any type of racist activity should be exceptable anywhere in the United States if we are to really make a difference in the supposive"UNITED"country!</p></blockquote>
<p> I reckon, we all do something about it! and, fast!don't you?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48553</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48553</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;THE SHAKEDOWN BREAKDOWN&lt;/strong&gt;

Walter Olson *and Ted Frank* at Overlawyered have an excellent blog series on the reparations scam--see here, here, and here. Meanwhile, Instapunk takes out the Reparations Calculator and tallies up the debts. Update: The always insightful Jeff Jacoby...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>THE SHAKEDOWN BREAKDOWN</strong></p>
<p>Walter Olson *and Ted Frank* at Overlawyered have an excellent blog series on the reparations scam--see here, here, and here. Meanwhile, Instapunk takes out the Reparations Calculator and tallies up the debts. Update: The always insightful Jeff Jacoby...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Mexico</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48552</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Mexico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48552</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Will there be a Senate debate on lynching apology?&lt;/strong&gt;

I don&#039;t think, with all due respects to The Captain, that there will be any &quot;debate&quot; in the Senate and I predict that the measure will pass by unanimous voice vote. We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Will there be a Senate debate on lynching apology?</strong></p>
<p>I don't think, with all due respects to The Captain, that there will be any "debate" in the Senate and I predict that the measure will pass by unanimous voice vote. We'll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/congress_to_apologize_for_lynching/comment-page-1/#comment-48551</link>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10925#comment-48551</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The fact that juries refused to convict whites for the murders of blacks, while unconscionable, was simply considered local business. &lt;/em&gt;

Yes, wrong indeed.  Congress should next apologize for the jury who who refused to convict OJ for the murder of two whites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The fact that juries refused to convict whites for the murders of blacks, while unconscionable, was simply considered local business. </em></p>
<p>Yes, wrong indeed.  Congress should next apologize for the jury who who refused to convict OJ for the murder of two whites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
