<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservatives Split Over Harriet Miers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:18:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Borlos</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/comment-page-1/#comment-59967</link>
		<dc:creator>Borlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12227#comment-59967</guid>
		<description>Has Frank Luntz circulated a memo yet on how we should pitch the Miers candidacy?  I am assuming, if we just continue to harp on about what &quot;good character&quot; she has, she&#039;ll sail through.  

&quot;Character&quot; is a nice, vacuous word that people associate with judges.  As long as we repeat it enough, liberal opposition will undoubtedly succum to our will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Frank Luntz circulated a memo yet on how we should pitch the Miers candidacy?  I am assuming, if we just continue to harp on about what "good character" she has, she'll sail through.  </p>
<p>"Character" is a nice, vacuous word that people associate with judges.  As long as we repeat it enough, liberal opposition will undoubtedly succum to our will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Outpost</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/comment-page-1/#comment-59950</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12227#comment-59950</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Miers Chronicles: 10/5&lt;/strong&gt;

Today&#039;s round-up of the latest on the Miers nomiination. Polipundit does some nominee daydreaming Thinking about 30 years of intellectual firepower on the Court Captain Ed wonders if religion will prove a hinge for Miers Well, it certainly won&#039;t make...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Miers Chronicles: 10/5</strong></p>
<p>Today's round-up of the latest on the Miers nomiination. Polipundit does some nominee daydreaming Thinking about 30 years of intellectual firepower on the Court Captain Ed wonders if religion will prove a hinge for Miers Well, it certainly won't make...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/comment-page-1/#comment-59948</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12227#comment-59948</guid>
		<description>I keep seeing the word &#039;unqualified&#039; tossed around like it was cannon.

Dare I ask, on what basis is she unqualified?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep seeing the word 'unqualified' tossed around like it was cannon.</p>
<p>Dare I ask, on what basis is she unqualified?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/comment-page-1/#comment-59947</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12227#comment-59947</guid>
		<description>I must say, the endorsement from my old Con Law prof (Kmiec) is a pretty powerful antidote to my own concerns about Miers. Prof. Kmiec is no slouch in such matters and, perhaps more importantly for ill-at-ease conservatives, is a committed and principled strict constructionist.

I tend to doubt Bush&#039;s game here is so deep that he&#039;s chosen a conscious strategy of getting liberals to use up all their powder defeating one of his nominees (as they are clearly slavering to do, no matter the justification) and thus pave the way for a younger, more obviously qualified but also more obviously conservative nominee they&#039;d be hard-pressed politically to deny after defeating one. But, hey, if that&#039;s his game, who better to play sacrificial lamb than someone who&#039;s intensely loyal to him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, the endorsement from my old Con Law prof (Kmiec) is a pretty powerful antidote to my own concerns about Miers. Prof. Kmiec is no slouch in such matters and, perhaps more importantly for ill-at-ease conservatives, is a committed and principled strict constructionist.</p>
<p>I tend to doubt Bush's game here is so deep that he's chosen a conscious strategy of getting liberals to use up all their powder defeating one of his nominees (as they are clearly slavering to do, no matter the justification) and thus pave the way for a younger, more obviously qualified but also more obviously conservative nominee they'd be hard-pressed politically to deny after defeating one. But, hey, if that's his game, who better to play sacrificial lamb than someone who's intensely loyal to him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/comment-page-1/#comment-59941</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12227#comment-59941</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m not sure he truly cares about the judiciary, except insofar that it&#039;s an obstacle to his policy preferences.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Always happy to record the times when JJ and I are in 100% agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I'm not sure he truly cares about the judiciary, except insofar that it's an obstacle to his policy preferences.</p></blockquote>
<p>Always happy to record the times when JJ and I are in 100% agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/comment-page-1/#comment-59925</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12227#comment-59925</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Parties Conflicted Over Miers Nomination&lt;/strong&gt;

President Bush&#039;s decision to make White House counsel Harriet Miers his second Supreme Court no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Parties Conflicted Over Miers Nomination</strong></p>
<p>President Bush&#39;s decision to make White House counsel Harriet Miers his second Supreme Court no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crist.tv - Political Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conservatives Split On Miers</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/conservatives_split_over_harriet_miers/comment-page-1/#comment-59920</link>
		<dc:creator>Crist.tv - Political Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conservatives Split On Miers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12227#comment-59920</guid>
		<description>[...] But, others even suggest a grand master plan to force the Democrats to use all of their energy in defeating her or approve an unqualified nominee. There is a certain delicious irony here. Enough of the president&#8217;s usual allies are concerned that the nominee could be defeated if the Democrats unite against Miers. Yet, while that would be a short term political victory, it is almost inconceivable that a follow-on nominee would be more to their liking than Miers. So, they will have to fight to get her confirmed or risk having her followed by a much more likely conservative that they would be hard-pressed to defeat. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But, others even suggest a grand master plan to force the Democrats to use all of their energy in defeating her or approve an unqualified nominee. There is a certain delicious irony here. Enough of the president&#8217;s usual allies are concerned that the nominee could be defeated if the Democrats unite against Miers. Yet, while that would be a short term political victory, it is almost inconceivable that a follow-on nominee would be more to their liking than Miers. So, they will have to fight to get her confirmed or risk having her followed by a much more likely conservative that they would be hard-pressed to defeat. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
