<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CONTRACT II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/contract_ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/contract_ii/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 11:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/contract_ii/#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3232#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>That's an interesting idea, but one that'd be demagogued to death by the civil rights establishment.  How about a "Contract With New America" instead which bundles together a group of GOP Latino and immigrant outreach programs, including the Hatch Citizenship Amendment?



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's an interesting idea, but one that'd be demagogued to death by the civil rights establishment.  How about a "Contract With New America" instead which bundles together a group of GOP Latino and immigrant outreach programs, including the Hatch Citizenship Amendment?</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
