Counter Cyclical Payroll Taxes
 |
Steve Verdon | Friday, February 6, 2009 |
Mario Rizzo points out that Keynes liked this idea.
I am converted to your proposal…for varying rates of contributions in good and bad times. (June 16, 1942). Keynes, Collected Writings, vol. 27, p. 208.
…[Y]ou are able to show fluctuations in income of an order of magnitude which is significant in the context… So far as employees are concerned, reductions in contributions are more likely to lead to increased expenditure as compared with saving than a reduction in income tax would, and are free from the objection to a reduction in income tax that the wealthier classes would benefit disproportionately. At the same time, the reduction to employers, operating as a mitigation of the costs of production, will come in particularly helpfully in bad times. (July 1, 1942). Keynes, Collected Writings, vol. 27, p. 218.
In regards to stimulus this strikes me as a good way to go. If there is a multiplier, especially for low income people this would put money into their hands, possibly very, very quickly. And since the payroll tax is a flat tax it would provide a larger stimulus for those at the lower end of the income distribution. The potential problems with this approach are that there is already a large fiscal imbalance in the programs these taxes fund. Lowering the tax rate would only make it worse, but I don’t know how much worse. Another problem is would there be the political will to either go back to the initial tax rate or even higher when the economy turns around?
About the Author: Steve has a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, Los Angeles and attended graduate school at The George Washington University, leaving school shortly before staring work on his dissertation when his first child was born. He works in the energy industry and prior to that worked at the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Division of Price Index and Number Research.
- Counter Cyclical Payroll Taxes
- More on Stimulus Lag
- Take from the Super Rich and Give to the Rich
- Top 1% Pay More (Income) Taxes Than Bottom 95%
- Health Care Reform Tax on Low Income Earners
- My Stimulus Plan
- Amar Bhide on Fearmongering and the Economy
- Maybe I Was Too Optimistic
- McCain Tax Cuts Favor Taxpayers (aka, ‘Wealthy’)
- Income Inequality in Sports Mirrors Life
- Swine flu is more popular than Dodd
- Paradox of Choice Paradoxically Untrue
- Private Forecasters Support Claim That Stimulus Worked
- Entertaining Kids During the Holidays
- How Much Will Escalation Cost?
- No Party of No
- Thought of the Day
- Queer International Studies
- OTB Latenight – r.e.m.
- Krugman on the Debt and Deficits
If we are going to do a drunken midnight raid on the Treasury, like we sometimes do on my wine cellar, we might as well do it this way.
As for going back to current rates? Make it a 2 year sundown requiring 80% approval to retain.
I understand this payroll tax holiday has been talked about a little bit, but I don't think it's made it into the bill. What's the objection?
I've thought this is the way it should work, but isn't the problem that it's too late to be rationally counter-cyclical?
We have spent the last five years spending at deficit (stimulus) levels. We were doing that during what was called a recovery.
If we double-down now, isn't that as crazed as spending stimulus? Both move us further and further from a balanced budget.
Comments are Closed
