<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coverage of the Uncoverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coverage_of_the_uncoverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coverage_of_the_uncoverage/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 11:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coverage_of_the_uncoverage/#comment-12310</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5034#comment-12310</guid>
		<description>Has it occurred to you that perhaps the reason Congress is getting involved is because the people have demanded it, libertarians notwithstanding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has it occurred to you that perhaps the reason Congress is getting involved is because the people have demanded it, libertarians notwithstanding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coverage_of_the_uncoverage/#comment-12311</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5034#comment-12311</guid>
		<description>Not a boob tax, thankyouverymuch. 

But consider a penis tax, based on... well.... "wealth".  
 
Think of the conundrum faced by guys filling out their returns... the natural inclination to over report coming up against an equally  natural inclination to under report. 
 
And the audits could get interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a boob tax, thankyouverymuch. </p>
<p>But consider a penis tax, based on... well.... "wealth".  </p>
<p>Think of the conundrum faced by guys filling out their returns... the natural inclination to over report coming up against an equally  natural inclination to under report. </p>
<p>And the audits could get interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/coverage_of_the_uncoverage/#comment-12312</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5034#comment-12312</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But consider a penis tax, based on... well.... "wealth".&lt;/i&gt;
I like the idea, my taxes would drop radically. But I don't want any laughing during the audit, I don't consider the matter funny.

Seriously though, I'm glad that Janet's boob is one of the largest problems facing our nation, as evidenced by the Congressional probe.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But consider a penis tax, based on... well.... "wealth".</i><br />
I like the idea, my taxes would drop radically. But I don't want any laughing during the audit, I don't consider the matter funny.</p>
<p>Seriously though, I'm glad that Janet's boob is one of the largest problems facing our nation, as evidenced by the Congressional probe.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
