Comments on: Creationism In The Classroom

By: bruce

bruce — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:29:27 +0000

Google "the next to the Last pope"

Christians. Sheesh!

By: Garrison Whitt

Garrison Whitt — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:35:45 +0000

Before I go ahead and finish writing, I will state that I'm 15 years old and in high school. Go ahead and discount what I say - yeah, I'm just a kid. So?

Evolution is a load of malarkey its a whole lot of hogwash being used by the idiots who come up with the rediclous idea that we came from apes and all they got to show for it is a few dumb bone fragments a few fossels and a crack-pot theory

You oviously don't know what the theory of evolution is, and how it relates to the evolution of humans. Listen carefully, I'll only say this once. HUMANS DID NOT EVOLVE FROM APES. The evolution of humans is thought to be an example of divergent evolution - that means apes and humans split from a common ancestor.

I just read a headline that said âFinally science admits evolution is just a theoryâ. Idiots.

Idiots indeed. Who needs to admit that the "Theory of evolution" is "just" a theory? There is no "just" in theorys. Gravity is a theory. Do you believe in gravity? Or is the earth just flat?

By: Robert Prather

Robert Prather — Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:15:09 +0000

Enjoy your horoscope!

By: secular European

secular European — Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:11:00 +0000

yep.. sorry we are all having a good chuckle at your expense.. Thanks!

By: bruce

bruce — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:44:01 +0000

Maybe all those creationists should take biology

By: bruce

bruce — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:31:51 +0000

so?

By: bruce

bruce — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:18:03 +0000

Read the transcripts for the case. It is beautiful.

http://www2.ncseweb.org/wp/

The ACLU lawyers are wiping the floor with the ID folks. I'm sorry, I really don't mean to be nasty but ID is serious ignorance. I just read a headline that said "Finally science admits evolution is just a theory". Idiots. Education would fix their religion problem.

By: Robert Prather

Robert Prather — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 02:28:24 +0000

DL,

There's nothing about evolution that precludes a Creator. Science is based on what is proven, even if it is incomplete. Hypotheses are put forward and tested using evidence. That's what distinguishes evolution from ID.

That's the argument here: one is science, the other is not. One is appropriate for teaching in science classes, the other is not.

By: DL

DL — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:39:07 +0000

The scientists want the world to accept their creationism theories on faith, because they can't prove through scientific methodology that God didn't create the world.

The creationists can't prove that God did create the world, but they need to accept all truth whether scientific or biblical, as their God can't deny scientific truth either.

In short, neither side can prove their case and both ask us to accept their positions on faith.

Science needs to leave open the possibility that a God may have created the world (through evolution?) and creationists need to leave open that possibility also.

The problem is that science can't measure God, therefore, can't prove (nor disprove), but they need not reject that the possibility that a creative God exists. He's just outside of their area of expertese.

My Doctor can't see my conscience, but it certainly exists.

By: ken

ken — Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:02:52 +0000

Any idiot who votes Republican deserves to have their children taught creationism instead of science.