<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dan Rather&#8217;s Legacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dan_rather_looks_back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dan_rather_looks_back/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:20:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Decision '08</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dan_rather_looks_back/comment-page-1/#comment-38695</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision '08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 02:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9544#comment-38695</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Weekly Jackass Number Fourteen: Dan Rather&lt;/strong&gt;
Really, who else could it be? I&#039;ve already paid a tongue-in-cheek tribute to Gunga Dan in the series Rather Excellent Tales, so I thought I&#039;d pretty much shut up for a change and let others do this week&#039;s installment. Let&#039;s see what everyone else i...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Weekly Jackass Number Fourteen: Dan Rather</strong><br />
Really, who else could it be? I've already paid a tongue-in-cheek tribute to Gunga Dan in the series Rather Excellent Tales, so I thought I'd pretty much shut up for a change and let others do this week's installment. Let's see what everyone else i...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Tanner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dan_rather_looks_back/comment-page-1/#comment-38652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Tanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9544#comment-38652</guid>
		<description>&#039;Granted, Rather&#039;s goofy style makes your eyes bulge and your ears buzz.&#039;

Umm...not mine. I&#039;m sure i haven&#039;t seen him for 25 years.

&#039;You used to be able to trust the content. News programs were based on integrity, credibility.&#039;

No - their lies just didn&#039;t get exposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>'Granted, Rather's goofy style makes your eyes bulge and your ears buzz.'</p>
<p>Umm...not mine. I'm sure i haven't seen him for 25 years.</p>
<p>'You used to be able to trust the content. News programs were based on integrity, credibility.'</p>
<p>No - their lies just didn't get exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Meckler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dan_rather_looks_back/comment-page-1/#comment-38632</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Meckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9544#comment-38632</guid>
		<description>I worked for CBS during the Tisch years, and I feel sadness for what happened to CBS News during the Rather era. I discuss the decline of CBS in &lt;a href=&quot;http://red-state.com/0305/030905.html&quot;&gt;todayâs online column&lt;/a&gt; on my own weblog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://red-state.com&quot;&gt;RED-STATE.COM&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked for CBS during the Tisch years, and I feel sadness for what happened to CBS News during the Rather era. I discuss the decline of CBS in <a href="http://red-state.com/0305/030905.html">todayâs online column</a> on my own weblog, <a href="http://red-state.com">RED-STATE.COM</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dan_rather_looks_back/comment-page-1/#comment-38630</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9544#comment-38630</guid>
		<description>According to their &lt;a href=&quot;Viacomâs well-known brands include CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon, Nick at Nite, VH1, BET, Paramount Pictures, Infinity Broadcasting, Viacom Outdoor, UPN, TV Land, Comedy Central, CMT: Country Music Television, King World, Spike TV, Showtime, and Simon &amp; Schuster. &quot;&gt;site&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Viacomâs well-known brands include CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon, Nick at Nite, VH1, BET, Paramount Pictures, Infinity Broadcasting, Viacom Outdoor, UPN, TV Land, Comedy Central, CMT: Country Music Television, King World, Spike TV, Showtime, and Simon &amp; Schuster.&quot;

So, yes, they own a lot of other media companies--but they&#039;re all entertainment focused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to their <a href="Viacomâs well-known brands include CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon, Nick at Nite, VH1, BET, Paramount Pictures, Infinity Broadcasting, Viacom Outdoor, UPN, TV Land, Comedy Central, CMT: Country Music Television, King World, Spike TV, Showtime, and Simon &#038; Schuster. ">site</a>, "Viacomâs well-known brands include CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon, Nick at Nite, VH1, BET, Paramount Pictures, Infinity Broadcasting, Viacom Outdoor, UPN, TV Land, Comedy Central, CMT: Country Music Television, King World, Spike TV, Showtime, and Simon &#038; Schuster."</p>
<p>So, yes, they own a lot of other media companies--but they're all entertainment focused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Henley</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dan_rather_looks_back/comment-page-1/#comment-38628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Henley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9544#comment-38628</guid>
		<description>Does CBS/Viacom own any significant cable franchises? It seems like ABC, NBC and Fox have all tried to adapt to the changing TV landscape. (MTV, right? Anything else?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does CBS/Viacom own any significant cable franchises? It seems like ABC, NBC and Fox have all tried to adapt to the changing TV landscape. (MTV, right? Anything else?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dan_rather_looks_back/comment-page-1/#comment-38622</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9544#comment-38622</guid>
		<description>&quot;In 1980, 75 percent of televisions in use during the dinner hour were airing an evening news broadcast from one of three networks&quot;

You used to be able to trust the content.  News programs were based on integrity, credibility.

Now it&#039;s just a show.  They push sensationalism for ratings, propaganda for political uproar.  It&#039;s not a story unless it&#039;s negative, even if you have to make it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"In 1980, 75 percent of televisions in use during the dinner hour were airing an evening news broadcast from one of three networks"</p>
<p>You used to be able to trust the content.  News programs were based on integrity, credibility.</p>
<p>Now it's just a show.  They push sensationalism for ratings, propaganda for political uproar.  It's not a story unless it's negative, even if you have to make it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
