<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC STATEHOOD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:27:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave W</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/comment-page-1/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2018#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>I seriously doubt we will ever see DC become a state.  It won&#039;t become a state for the obvious reason that the GOP will not want to add 2 more Democrats to the Senate and an additional Democratic Representative to the Congress, especially in this 50/50 country. 

Adding DC to Maryland might actually cuts both ways.  Adding DC to Maryland would most likely increase Maryland&#039;s representation in Congress by one and take a seat away from another state (possibly a GOP seat, a plus for Democrats).  However, in presidential elections, DC right now gets 3 electoral votes. Adding it Maryland would probably boost Maryland electoral votes by one, but the Democrats would lose the 3 electoral votes it currently gets every election from DC. (a net +2 or +3 electoral votes for the GOP).

Does anyone know what it would take for DC to become part of Maryland?  A simple majority in Congress or 2/3 of Congress?  Do the other 50 states have to approve it as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously doubt we will ever see DC become a state.  It won't become a state for the obvious reason that the GOP will not want to add 2 more Democrats to the Senate and an additional Democratic Representative to the Congress, especially in this 50/50 country. </p>
<p>Adding DC to Maryland might actually cuts both ways.  Adding DC to Maryland would most likely increase Maryland's representation in Congress by one and take a seat away from another state (possibly a GOP seat, a plus for Democrats).  However, in presidential elections, DC right now gets 3 electoral votes. Adding it Maryland would probably boost Maryland electoral votes by one, but the Democrats would lose the 3 electoral votes it currently gets every election from DC. (a net +2 or +3 electoral votes for the GOP).</p>
<p>Does anyone know what it would take for DC to become part of Maryland?  A simple majority in Congress or 2/3 of Congress?  Do the other 50 states have to approve it as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/comment-page-1/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2018#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re basically right on the politics of DC statehood.

Article IV, Section 3 has the process: 

&lt;blockquote&gt; Section 3. New states may be admitted by the Congress into this union; but no new states shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as of the Congress. The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular state. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 

So, a simple majority vote would do it.  Congress is composed of representatives from the states, so, yes, indirectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you're basically right on the politics of DC statehood.</p>
<p>Article IV, Section 3 has the process: </p>
<blockquote><p> Section 3. New states may be admitted by the Congress into this union; but no new states shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as of the Congress. The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular state. </p></blockquote>
<p>So, a simple majority vote would do it.  Congress is composed of representatives from the states, so, yes, indirectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/comment-page-1/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2018#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>/me whistles  

you forgot the most politically active sub-million (600K) state with the most &lt;i&gt;noticeable&lt;/i&gt; politicians... Vermont. 

And the population has only really grown since the 1960s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/me whistles  </p>
<p>you forgot the most politically active sub-million (600K) state with the most <i>noticeable</i> politicians... Vermont. </p>
<p>And the population has only really grown since the 1960s...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/comment-page-1/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2018#comment-2100</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the 25th Amendment makes making D.C. a state more, not less, complicated.  Even if the rump District of Columbia was restricted to just the federal buildings and land, there&#039;d still be three electoral votes for the homeless and/or anyone squatting on federal land.

There might be an effective remedy to the squatting problem (redesignating the District as an unoccupied atoll, preferably one that&#039;s highly radioactive) but I&#039;m not sure how you deal with the electoral votes under a retrocession situation (since they&#039;d still count toward the 270-vote threshold, but nobody could win them).

The other problem is: what happens if the federal government cedes its claim to D.C. but Maryland (quite sensibly, I might add) refuses to take it back?  Does Virginia get dibs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the 25th Amendment makes making D.C. a state more, not less, complicated.  Even if the rump District of Columbia was restricted to just the federal buildings and land, there'd still be three electoral votes for the homeless and/or anyone squatting on federal land.</p>
<p>There might be an effective remedy to the squatting problem (redesignating the District as an unoccupied atoll, preferably one that's highly radioactive) but I'm not sure how you deal with the electoral votes under a retrocession situation (since they'd still count toward the 270-vote threshold, but nobody could win them).</p>
<p>The other problem is: what happens if the federal government cedes its claim to D.C. but Maryland (quite sensibly, I might add) refuses to take it back?  Does Virginia get dibs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/comment-page-1/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2018#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Yes, you make a good point on the Electoral Votes. Presumably, we&#039;d have to repeal that amendment in exchange for them getting representation in Congress.

I would think Maryland would be glad to have the District, since it would mean another Representative and more federal revenue, but maybe not.  I guess Virginia would be the most logical recepient at that point, even though they have no claim to that land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Yes, you make a good point on the Electoral Votes. Presumably, we'd have to repeal that amendment in exchange for them getting representation in Congress.</p>
<p>I would think Maryland would be glad to have the District, since it would mean another Representative and more federal revenue, but maybe not.  I guess Virginia would be the most logical recepient at that point, even though they have no claim to that land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/comment-page-1/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2018#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Virginia would want it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think Virginia would want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political State Report</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/comment-page-1/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>Political State Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2018#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DC: RIDE FOR STATEHOOD&lt;/strong&gt;
A group of bicyclists gathered in the nation&#039;s capitol to protest the fact that this tiny city is not a state: About 75 bicyclists followed the wildly crooked course yesterday, traveling more than 60 miles and getting a comprehensive tour of each of th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DC: RIDE FOR STATEHOOD</strong><br />
A group of bicyclists gathered in the nation's capitol to protest the fact that this tiny city is not a state: About 75 bicyclists followed the wildly crooked course yesterday, traveling more than 60 miles and getting a comprehensive tour of each of th...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signifying Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dc_statehood/comment-page-1/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>Signifying Nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2018#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Retrocession or Statehood&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner (Outside the Beltway) has a good discussion going about the politics and mechanisms for sorting out the D.C. voting mess. The possibilities, in...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Retrocession or Statehood</strong><br />
James Joyner (Outside the Beltway) has a good discussion going about the politics and mechanisms for sorting out the D.C. voting mess. The possibilities, in...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
