Comments on: DEATH MARKET III http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/death_market_iii/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Matthew http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/death_market_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-3771 Matthew Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=2689#comment-3771 I read Gross' piece last night and his misuse of the term "rational actor" struck me as a freshman political science mistake. Moreover, the overly negative reaction to the futures issue in the press also makes me think that nobody -- and I mean nobody -- actually bothered to talk to people with a poli sci or econ background before frothing about FutureMAP/PAM. Although, on the plus side, I'll be able to cite this episode to colleagues next time I get into a debate about "reactionary Republicans." I read Gross' piece last night and his misuse of the term "rational actor" struck me as a freshman political science mistake. Moreover, the overly negative reaction to the futures issue in the press also makes me think that nobody -- and I mean nobody -- actually bothered to talk to people with a poli sci or econ background before frothing about FutureMAP/PAM. Although, on the plus side, I'll be able to cite this episode to colleagues next time I get into a debate about "reactionary Republicans."

]]> By: The American Mind http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/death_market_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-3772 The American Mind Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=2689#comment-3772 <strong>Name Wasn't PAM's Problem</strong> Let me respond to James Joyner's critique of PAM: Indeed. But this is yet another case (TIPS being the most --- Name Wasn't PAM's Problem
Let me respond to James Joyner's critique of PAM: Indeed. But this is yet another case (TIPS being the most

---

]]>