<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking the Debunking of Cosby on Blacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:39:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-65739</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 05:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-65739</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;black stockings&lt;/strong&gt;

latino interracial love latina babes thick ass latina lesbians latina sex latina pussy big nipples latina booty lingerie models 8th street latina teen camel toe latina porn oops latin women interracial 8th street latina upskirt voyeur latin cuckold int...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>black stockings</strong></p>
<p>latino interracial love latina babes thick ass latina lesbians latina sex latina pussy big nipples latina booty lingerie models 8th street latina teen camel toe latina porn oops latin women interracial 8th street latina upskirt voyeur latin cuckold int...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-65573</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-65573</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ass&lt;/strong&gt;

ass parade asses ass in thong teen ass butt gay anal butts ass to mouth hot ass big black ass nice ass ass fuck nice ass anal sex nice ass anal sex teen ass hot ass nice ass butt big booty fat ass big booty big booty big booty anal fisting booty anal b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ass</strong></p>
<p>ass parade asses ass in thong teen ass butt gay anal butts ass to mouth hot ass big black ass nice ass ass fuck nice ass anal sex nice ass anal sex teen ass hot ass nice ass butt big booty fat ass big booty big booty big booty anal fisting booty anal b...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-64527</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-64527</guid>
		<description>Steve, James and others may have been referring to &#039;poor blacks&#039; as a referring to the same people Cosby was referring to: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;... Cosby contrasted the achievements of civil rights activists such as Parks with the current generation of &quot;lower-economic and lower-middle-economic people&quot; who he said have not been holding up their end of the deal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think &#039;lower income and lower-middle-economic people&#039; would understandably be considered &#039;poor&#039; as that term is commonly used. Cosby was not referring to those defined as &#039;poor&#039; by the Dept of Labor. 

If you look at the relative incomes you will see that the survey covered the same people that Cosby was referring to, so the dataset is actually ok for the purpose of debunking Cosby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, James and others may have been referring to 'poor blacks' as a referring to the same people Cosby was referring to: </p>
<blockquote><p>... Cosby contrasted the achievements of civil rights activists such as Parks with the current generation of "lower-economic and lower-middle-economic people" who he said have not been holding up their end of the deal.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think 'lower income and lower-middle-economic people' would understandably be considered 'poor' as that term is commonly used. Cosby was not referring to those defined as 'poor' by the Dept of Labor. </p>
<p>If you look at the relative incomes you will see that the survey covered the same people that Cosby was referring to, so the dataset is actually ok for the purpose of debunking Cosby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-64520</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-64520</guid>
		<description>&gt;It would be irresponsible for your average college professor to purchase a new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2004/03/22/cx_dl_0322feat.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ferrari Scaglietti&lt;/a&gt;;

James, next time make sure to use an Amazon referal link, you coulda made a bundle. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;It would be irresponsible for your average college professor to purchase a new <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2004/03/22/cx_dl_0322feat.html" rel="nofollow">Ferrari Scaglietti</a>;</p>
<p>James, next time make sure to use an Amazon referal link, you coulda made a bundle. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-64504</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-64504</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So we&#039;re about to be presented with data indicating that poor blacks do not, in fact, buy luxury items that they can not afford and otherwise engage in financially irresponsible behavior?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Guess the answer is:  No.

The question was:

Do &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;poor&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; blacks engage in frivolous expenditures?

Yet the data presented covers &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; blacks.  Wrong dataset there guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So we're about to be presented with data indicating that poor blacks do not, in fact, buy luxury items that they can not afford and otherwise engage in financially irresponsible behavior?</p></blockquote>
<p>Guess the answer is:  No.</p>
<p>The question was:</p>
<p>Do <em><strong>poor</strong></em> blacks engage in frivolous expenditures?</p>
<p>Yet the data presented covers <em><strong>all</strong></em> blacks.  Wrong dataset there guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-64496</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-64496</guid>
		<description>James, why is it not surprizing to find you supporting negative stereotypes? Is it because you are catering to the essentially racist nature of conservatism in order to build a following among conservatives?

A simple cursory look at the data shows that African American families are larger, younger, have fewer cars than white families. Do you think this might lead to more money spent for footwear? 

If that is not enough how about the fact that the data shows that survey units for whites are composed of 52% male and 48% female but for African American the survey units are composed of 36% male and 64% female. Have you ever compared the prices for womens shoes vs mens?

James, it would have been real easy for you to debunk the crap Tabarrak used to get a cheap shot in. Instead you help spread the stereotype. 

Is it any wonder people question your credibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, why is it not surprizing to find you supporting negative stereotypes? Is it because you are catering to the essentially racist nature of conservatism in order to build a following among conservatives?</p>
<p>A simple cursory look at the data shows that African American families are larger, younger, have fewer cars than white families. Do you think this might lead to more money spent for footwear? </p>
<p>If that is not enough how about the fact that the data shows that survey units for whites are composed of 52% male and 48% female but for African American the survey units are composed of 36% male and 64% female. Have you ever compared the prices for womens shoes vs mens?</p>
<p>James, it would have been real easy for you to debunk the crap Tabarrak used to get a cheap shot in. Instead you help spread the stereotype. </p>
<p>Is it any wonder people question your credibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dummocrats.com</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-64487</link>
		<dc:creator>Dummocrats.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-64487</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Debunking the Debunking of Cosby on Blacks&lt;/strong&gt;

Debunking the Debunking of Cosby on Blacks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Debunking the Debunking of Cosby on Blacks</strong></p>
<p>Debunking the Debunking of Cosby on Blacks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-64480</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-64480</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is a professor of religious studies doing research in economics and/or sociology? Isn&#039;t that rather outside his expertise?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Simple; It&#039;s in line with the professor&#039;s touting of &#039;liberation theology&#039;.

And once again, I will make the point as I have a few thousand times before... these are cultural issues, not racial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is a professor of religious studies doing research in economics and/or sociology? Isn't that rather outside his expertise?</p></blockquote>
<p>Simple; It's in line with the professor's touting of 'liberation theology'.</p>
<p>And once again, I will make the point as I have a few thousand times before... these are cultural issues, not racial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RA</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/debunking_the_debunking_of_cosby_on_blacks/comment-page-1/#comment-64479</link>
		<dc:creator>RA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12669#comment-64479</guid>
		<description>The one misnomer in this article is the word &quot;parents&quot;.  Those people in &quot;poverty&quot; are typically single women with one or more children.  In fact 7 of 10 black children are stuck in this guaranteed freefall to poverty, gangs, drug use, criminal behavior and once again single parenthood.  Then the vicious circle begins again.

Thank you pagan America for destroying so many families and children with your destructive ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one misnomer in this article is the word "parents".  Those people in "poverty" are typically single women with one or more children.  In fact 7 of 10 black children are stuck in this guaranteed freefall to poverty, gangs, drug use, criminal behavior and once again single parenthood.  Then the vicious circle begins again.</p>
<p>Thank you pagan America for destroying so many families and children with your destructive ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
