<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deconstructing the Brady Bunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-357215</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/#comment-357215</guid>
		<description>Life is too short for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life is too short for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-357107</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/#comment-357107</guid>
		<description>It looks to me that Jeffrey is sexist since he considers the only reason to have women around is to clean up after the males.  I took the statement “They were four men, living altogether, yet they were all alone” to mean this. They were living in the same house but lacking that family feeling and communication that kept them from interacting as a family thereby resulting in each being isolated. Only after the females came into the family did things get jarred loose and they became a family. The females were more of a catalyst in creating a family than some slaves for the males.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks to me that Jeffrey is sexist since he considers the only reason to have women around is to clean up after the males.  I took the statement “They were four men, living altogether, yet they were all alone” to mean this. They were living in the same house but lacking that family feeling and communication that kept them from interacting as a family thereby resulting in each being isolated. Only after the females came into the family did things get jarred loose and they became a family. The females were more of a catalyst in creating a family than some slaves for the males.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-357089</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/#comment-357089</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;Bunch creators believed that men must be entitled to enslave females (woMen).&quot;&quot;
&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;
 You mean Alice did not get Paid??

 The only unrealistic thing here is that she was doing a job no American would do?? [lol]

 The only Family member with a JOB was   MR.Brady, so who is the &quot;ENSLAVED&quot; party in this story??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>""Bunch creators believed that men must be entitled to enslave females (woMen).""<br />
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""<br />
 You mean Alice did not get Paid??</p>
<p> The only unrealistic thing here is that she was doing a job no American would do?? [lol]</p>
<p> The only Family member with a JOB was   MR.Brady, so who is the "ENSLAVED" party in this story??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-357056</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/#comment-357056</guid>
		<description>well, on many levels, their viewers don&#039;t really exist either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, on many levels, their viewers don't really exist either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodney dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-357051</link>
		<dc:creator>rodney dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/#comment-357051</guid>
		<description>...but with Alice as the surrogate second wife, this obviously was a Mormon plot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...but with Alice as the surrogate second wife, this obviously was a Mormon plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-357041</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/deconstructing_the_brady_bunch/#comment-357041</guid>
		<description>I suspect that their conclusions will rely on how they define their terms to start with.  If, as I suspect, any reaction against any Muslims anywhere under any circumstances fall within the definition of Islamophobia, I think we can be pretty confident that  nothing useful will come out of the conference.

If, on the other hand, a more commonsensical definition is used, e.g., over-generalization or reaction against all Muslims because of the actions of some Muslims, I think we can be pretty confident that nothing useful will come out of the conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that their conclusions will rely on how they define their terms to start with.  If, as I suspect, any reaction against any Muslims anywhere under any circumstances fall within the definition of Islamophobia, I think we can be pretty confident that  nothing useful will come out of the conference.</p>
<p>If, on the other hand, a more commonsensical definition is used, e.g., over-generalization or reaction against all Muslims because of the actions of some Muslims, I think we can be pretty confident that nothing useful will come out of the conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
