<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defending the Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defending_the_constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defending_the_constitution/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:32:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog:  A Rough Draft of my Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defending_the_constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-68821</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog:  A Rough Draft of my Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13053#comment-68821</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Article II and Domestic Spying&lt;/strong&gt;

	One of the things that raises red flags in my mind (I probably should get that checked) is when a person of authority asserts a debatable power in a way that is dubious on its face, or, at least, is extremely vague.  One of the several things about th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Article II and Domestic Spying</strong></p>
<p>	One of the things that raises red flags in my mind (I probably should get that checked) is when a person of authority asserts a debatable power in a way that is dubious on its face, or, at least, is extremely vague.  One of the several things about th...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defending_the_constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-68789</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13053#comment-68789</guid>
		<description>McGeehee, you better go read &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/article06/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Article VI&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=5&amp;sec=3331&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;5 USC 3311&lt;/a&gt; before you go spouting fallacies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McGeehee, you better go read <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/article06/" rel="nofollow">Article VI</a> and <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=5&amp;sec=3331" rel="nofollow">5 USC 3311</a> before you go spouting fallacies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defending_the_constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-68736</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13053#comment-68736</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Constitution requires all federal and state legislative, executive and judicial officers to take an oath.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It doesn&#039;t prescribe the oath except for president. Everyone from the vice-president on down takes an oath prescribed through legislation -- and as you say, virtually identical all the way down.

I remember a M*A*S*H episode where Klinger (IIRC) was drunk and depressed over his long-distance marriage breaking up, and wanted to re-enlist. Col. Potter had him recite the presidential oath so it wouldn&#039;t actually be binding when he sobered up and regained his senses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Constitution requires all federal and state legislative, executive and judicial officers to take an oath.</p></blockquote>
<p>It doesn't prescribe the oath except for president. Everyone from the vice-president on down takes an oath prescribed through legislation -- and as you say, virtually identical all the way down.</p>
<p>I remember a M*A*S*H episode where Klinger (IIRC) was drunk and depressed over his long-distance marriage breaking up, and wanted to re-enlist. Col. Potter had him recite the presidential oath so it wouldn't actually be binding when he sobered up and regained his senses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
