<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defense Department Seeks to Raise Enlistment Age to 42</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:13:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russell Newquist</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/comment-page-1/#comment-52429</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Newquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11388#comment-52429</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think the main reason they&#039;re looking for this change is so that they can &lt;em&gt;re&lt;/em&gt;-enlist soldiers who were in for a while previously and have experience that they want.  I don&#039;t have any links to point to right now, but I remember a while back reading that the army was having problems because a lot of talented and experienced people actually &lt;em&gt;wanted&lt;/em&gt; to rejoin, but couldn&#039;t because they were too old.  The number isn&#039;t huge, and probably isn&#039;t enough to offset their recruiting problems (in terms of numbers), but even a small number of troops is extremely valuable if they&#039;re already experienced and trained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think the main reason they're looking for this change is so that they can <em>re</em>-enlist soldiers who were in for a while previously and have experience that they want.  I don't have any links to point to right now, but I remember a while back reading that the army was having problems because a lot of talented and experienced people actually <em>wanted</em> to rejoin, but couldn't because they were too old.  The number isn't huge, and probably isn't enough to offset their recruiting problems (in terms of numbers), but even a small number of troops is extremely valuable if they're already experienced and trained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Carlton</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/comment-page-1/#comment-52425</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Carlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11388#comment-52425</guid>
		<description>Ironically, I was under the impression that they had already raised the age cap, and was actually planning, this week, to inquire about it. I&#039;m 42, but would seriously consider joining if they thought they needed me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, I was under the impression that they had already raised the age cap, and was actually planning, this week, to inquire about it. I'm 42, but would seriously consider joining if they thought they needed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Surber</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/comment-page-1/#comment-52399</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Surber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11388#comment-52399</guid>
		<description>When they get to 51, wake me up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they get to 51, wake me up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick DeMent</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/comment-page-1/#comment-52396</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick DeMent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11388#comment-52396</guid>
		<description>Damn, still too old</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, still too old</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JACK ARMY</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/comment-page-1/#comment-52386</link>
		<dc:creator>JACK ARMY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11388#comment-52386</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Uncle Sam wants you even if you&#039;re 42 years old&lt;/strong&gt;

The main advantage, especially for the Army, is that this gives prior service folks 7 more years to get back in and restart their careers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Uncle Sam wants you even if you're 42 years old</strong></p>
<p>The main advantage, especially for the Army, is that this gives prior service folks 7 more years to get back in and restart their careers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/comment-page-1/#comment-52371</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11388#comment-52371</guid>
		<description>Boomers retiring between the ages of 35-42?  LOL, not in this economy. I think you are remembering the Clinton years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boomers retiring between the ages of 35-42?  LOL, not in this economy. I think you are remembering the Clinton years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Boness</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/comment-page-1/#comment-52369</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Boness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11388#comment-52369</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a whole bunch of Boomers with extensive life experience, including prior military service, who will be retiring soon and looking for a second career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a whole bunch of Boomers with extensive life experience, including prior military service, who will be retiring soon and looking for a second career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/defense_department_seeks_to_raise_enlistment_age_to_42/comment-page-1/#comment-52364</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11388#comment-52364</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re looking to capture a pool of available talent--say, Arab linguists or Intell analysts?--who can do the work just as well, and perhaps with less training, than a 19-y/o. This, of course, leaves more 19-y/os available for combat.

It&#039;s not dissimilar from how retirees from government or the private sector are highly recruitable because they bring good work skills and abilities to the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they're looking to capture a pool of available talent--say, Arab linguists or Intell analysts?--who can do the work just as well, and perhaps with less training, than a 19-y/o. This, of course, leaves more 19-y/os available for combat.</p>
<p>It's not dissimilar from how retirees from government or the private sector are highly recruitable because they bring good work skills and abilities to the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
