<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEMOCRAT REACTIONS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:12:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Little Miss Attila</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9242</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Miss Attila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4228#comment-9242</guid>
		<description>To me, it really came across like, &quot;okay. Whatever. This is good, but we still need to get out of Dodge.&quot;

Say what . . . .?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, it really came across like, "okay. Whatever. This is good, but we still need to get out of Dodge."</p>
<p>Say what . . . .?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mithras</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mithras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4228#comment-9243</guid>
		<description>Take a good look at Saddam&#039;s picture.  He wasn&#039;t directing the attacks against U.S. forces.  His capture is a good thing for Iraqis, but it doesn&#039;t lessen so much as alter the dynamic of the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a good look at Saddam's picture.  He wasn't directing the attacks against U.S. forces.  His capture is a good thing for Iraqis, but it doesn't lessen so much as alter the dynamic of the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9244</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4228#comment-9244</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone was claiming he was actually running the insurgency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think anyone was claiming he was actually running the insurgency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norbizness</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9245</link>
		<dc:creator>Norbizness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4228#comment-9245</guid>
		<description>Definitely an odd editorial comment by you on Dean, James, although I&#039;m sure something short of &quot;I&#039;m immediately dropping out of the race&quot; would not have satisfied a lot of people.

And I&#039;m guessing the &quot;back&quot; could be plausibly read to mean he scaling back of efforts after the UN building was bombed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely an odd editorial comment by you on Dean, James, although I'm sure something short of "I'm immediately dropping out of the race" would not have satisfied a lot of people.</p>
<p>And I'm guessing the "back" could be plausibly read to mean he scaling back of efforts after the UN building was bombed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9246</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4228#comment-9246</guid>
		<description>What was odd about it?  It &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a pretty bland statement--he didn&#039;t say anything.  But rather than simply saying how proud he was of the troops and how great it was to capture a tyrannt, he blathers on about the &quot;international community&quot; as if they had anything to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was odd about it?  It <i>was</i> a pretty bland statement--he didn't say anything.  But rather than simply saying how proud he was of the troops and how great it was to capture a tyrannt, he blathers on about the "international community" as if they had anything to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9247</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4228#comment-9247</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading various commentary all day, and what keeps bringing me up short is the cautionary argument that &quot;Saddam obviously wasn&#039;t directing attacks from a dirt hole, and therefore, don&#039;t expect them to wind down&quot; 

...- as though discovering him in a dirt hole means &lt;i&gt;he&#039;s been trapped there during the past 6 months&lt;/i&gt; 
 
WTF? 

Was he controlling attacks? Obviously, not all of them. And no question that they&#039;re sure to continue. But the conclusion that he was somehow incapable of involvement, because he was found in a dirt pit &quot;without even a cell phone&quot;,  does remind me of the type of logic I see in my dog, when, having discovered a stray toy under the couch, barks &quot;Eureka!&quot;  and continues to go back to that spot for the rest of the week, looking for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been reading various commentary all day, and what keeps bringing me up short is the cautionary argument that "Saddam obviously wasn't directing attacks from a dirt hole, and therefore, don't expect them to wind down" </p>
<p>...- as though discovering him in a dirt hole means <i>he's been trapped there during the past 6 months</i> </p>
<p>WTF? </p>
<p>Was he controlling attacks? Obviously, not all of them. And no question that they're sure to continue. But the conclusion that he was somehow incapable of involvement, because he was found in a dirt pit "without even a cell phone",  does remind me of the type of logic I see in my dog, when, having discovered a stray toy under the couch, barks "Eureka!"  and continues to go back to that spot for the rest of the week, looking for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9248</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4228#comment-9248</guid>
		<description>Kate,

My guess is that he was in that hidey hole for no more than a few days. But it&#039;s always struck me as unlikely he was issuing too many commands--he didn&#039;t have the instruments of power anymore and was too busy hiding.  With that reward money out there, it was too risky to do much communicating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate,</p>
<p>My guess is that he was in that hidey hole for no more than a few days. But it's always struck me as unlikely he was issuing too many commands--he didn't have the instruments of power anymore and was too busy hiding.  With that reward money out there, it was too risky to do much communicating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth Laid Bear</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrat_reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9249</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth Laid Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4228#comment-9249</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Saddam Captured Alive: Weblog Reactions&lt;/strong&gt;
Saddam Hussein has been captured in Iraq. I&#039;m still waking up and not suitable for rational commentary yet, other than a simple &quot;YES!&quot; when I heard the news. So here&#039;s a quick roundup of the word around the blogosphere, by

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Saddam Captured Alive: Weblog Reactions</strong><br />
Saddam Hussein has been captured in Iraq. I'm still waking up and not suitable for rational commentary yet, other than a simple "YES!" when I heard the news. So here's a quick roundup of the word around the blogosphere, by</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
