<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Drop Timeline, Pork from Iraq Supplemental</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BlogRunner: Democrats Pull Troop Deadline From Iraq Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/comment-page-1/#comment-128114</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogRunner: Democrats Pull Troop Deadline From Iraq Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 00:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/#comment-128114</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]  [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...]  [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anjin-San</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/comment-page-1/#comment-127469</link>
		<dc:creator>Anjin-San</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/#comment-127469</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Now, was that so hard?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, it is for the folks who are going to be killed in Iraq. But, I foget, Bushies are not losing any sleep over that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now, was that so hard?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, it is for the folks who are going to be killed in Iraq. But, I foget, Bushies are not losing any sleep over that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/comment-page-1/#comment-127416</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/#comment-127416</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we could call it the Lieberman Paradox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we could call it the Lieberman Paradox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/comment-page-1/#comment-127412</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/#comment-127412</guid>
		<description>No true Scotsman&#133;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No true Scotsman&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/comment-page-1/#comment-127402</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/#comment-127402</guid>
		<description>Those that are truly inflamed about Iraq, actually, won&#039;t vote for Dems that don&#039;t take a hardline stance.  They&#039;ll be in the same position that pro-life zealots will be in if Giuliani wins the (R) nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those that are truly inflamed about Iraq, actually, won't vote for Dems that don't take a hardline stance.  They'll be in the same position that pro-life zealots will be in if Giuliani wins the (R) nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/comment-page-1/#comment-127395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/#comment-127395</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Mount primary challenges; not vote; or vote for Greens.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Uh huh.  As I said, they&#039;ll vote for the Democrats on the ballot (90%+ of whom will be incumbents) or Republicans will be elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Mount primary challenges; not vote; or vote for Greens.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh huh.  As I said, they'll vote for the Democrats on the ballot (90%+ of whom will be incumbents) or Republicans will be elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/comment-page-1/#comment-127394</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 14:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/#comment-127394</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What will their “withdraw now” constituents do? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mount primary challenges; not vote; or vote for Greens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What will their “withdraw now” constituents do? </p></blockquote>
<p>Mount primary challenges; not vote; or vote for Greens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/comment-page-1/#comment-127388</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/democrats_drop_timeline_pork_from_iraq_supplemental/#comment-127388</guid>
		<description>See my comment under Steve Verdon&#039;s peak oil post above.

This situation is perfect for Congressional Democrats.  They can make fiery speeches about the evils of the Bush Administration, that we were led into war under false pretenses, and that we should withdraw from Iraq immediately.  Next week!  Tomorrow!

They will get all of the benefits of support from their constituencies and, as long as they don&#039;t plan actually to do anything about it, will have to bear none of the consequences of &lt;b&gt;either&lt;/b&gt; blame for the ongoing situation in Iraq &lt;b&gt;or&lt;/b&gt; for the consequences of our leaving Iraq before things are more stable there than they are now.

What will their &#147;withdraw now&#148; constituents do?  Vote for Republicans?  Stay home and let (gasp!) Republicans be elected?  Not on your flameless cooker.

It&#039;s perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my comment under Steve Verdon's peak oil post above.</p>
<p>This situation is perfect for Congressional Democrats.  They can make fiery speeches about the evils of the Bush Administration, that we were led into war under false pretenses, and that we should withdraw from Iraq immediately.  Next week!  Tomorrow!</p>
<p>They will get all of the benefits of support from their constituencies and, as long as they don't plan actually to do anything about it, will have to bear none of the consequences of <b>either</b> blame for the ongoing situation in Iraq <b>or</b> for the consequences of our leaving Iraq before things are more stable there than they are now.</p>
<p>What will their &#8220;withdraw now&#8221; constituents do?  Vote for Republicans?  Stay home and let (gasp!) Republicans be elected?  Not on your flameless cooker.</p>
<p>It's perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
