<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Force &#8216;Real&#8217; Filibuster on Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:10:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice &#187; &#187; The Filibuster Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/comment-page-1/#comment-138677</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice &#187; &#187; The Filibuster Continues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/#comment-138677</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin Gateway Pundit Captain&#8217;s Quarters Sister Toldjah Don Surber Blogs For Bush Hot Air Outside the Beltway [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin Gateway Pundit Captain&#8217;s Quarters Sister Toldjah Don Surber Blogs For Bush Hot Air Outside the Beltway [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff b</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/comment-page-1/#comment-138622</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/#comment-138622</guid>
		<description>The quorum thing appears to be incorrect.  Check Talking Points Memo for an analysis of the Senate rules on quorum.

Anyway the whole point of this exercise is to make the minority back up their threats of endless debate.  Instead of threatening filibuster they are going to have to actually filibuster, which is a substantial difference.  And when the votes for cloture come around, the self-styled waverers of the minority party, who are claiming in television interviews that they oppose Bush&#039;s policies in Iraq, will need to finally put their vote where their mouths are.  If they truly oppose Bush&#039;s policies then they will have to vote for cloture and allow the full body to vote on the measures.

It has been slightly ridiculous that the majority has allowed certain members of the minority to distance themselves from Bush without forcing them to actually put it in writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quorum thing appears to be incorrect.  Check Talking Points Memo for an analysis of the Senate rules on quorum.</p>
<p>Anyway the whole point of this exercise is to make the minority back up their threats of endless debate.  Instead of threatening filibuster they are going to have to actually filibuster, which is a substantial difference.  And when the votes for cloture come around, the self-styled waverers of the minority party, who are claiming in television interviews that they oppose Bush's policies in Iraq, will need to finally put their vote where their mouths are.  If they truly oppose Bush's policies then they will have to vote for cloture and allow the full body to vote on the measures.</p>
<p>It has been slightly ridiculous that the majority has allowed certain members of the minority to distance themselves from Bush without forcing them to actually put it in writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/comment-page-1/#comment-138619</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/#comment-138619</guid>
		<description>Jeff
“The point is they will actually need to go on the record as being against a vote on the Iraq issues”

I’m not sure what you mean by this. The overnight session won’t force a vote on the amendments. They just need to continue the debate or show a lack of a quorum. No different from any other day session. Also the Republicans won’t be force into limited speech since there will unlikely be a agreement between the minority and majority parties as is the case in most sessions. 

Hopefully the Republicans will use this opportunity to bash the Dems on Senate floor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff<br />
“The point is they will actually need to go on the record as being against a vote on the Iraq issues”</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m not sure what you mean by this. The overnight session won&rsquo;t force a vote on the amendments. They just need to continue the debate or show a lack of a quorum. No different from any other day session. Also the Republicans won&rsquo;t be force into limited speech since there will unlikely be a agreement between the minority and majority parties as is the case in most sessions. </p>
<p>Hopefully the Republicans will use this opportunity to bash the Dems on Senate floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff b</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/comment-page-1/#comment-138615</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/#comment-138615</guid>
		<description>The point is they will actually need to go on the record as being against a vote on the Iraq issues.  The fakers who want to have it both ways, by publicly saying they oppose Bush&#039;s policies while working to perpetuate the same policies, will have their own hypocrisy exposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is they will actually need to go on the record as being against a vote on the Iraq issues.  The fakers who want to have it both ways, by publicly saying they oppose Bush's policies while working to perpetuate the same policies, will have their own hypocrisy exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/comment-page-1/#comment-138612</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/democrats_force_real_filibuster_on_iraq_withdrawal/#comment-138612</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t the Republicans heard of &#039;tag-team&#039;? It&#039;s not like there&#039;s only a half-dozen of them after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven't the Republicans heard of 'tag-team'? It's not like there's only a half-dozen of them after all...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
