Comments on: DEMOCRATS WILL PAY

By: David R. Block

David R. Block — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000

In 2001, the Democrats held the house and did not pass a single redistricting plan. Not for themselves, the senate, or congress. The Senate passed a plan for themselves, but it did not get out of the House. It was left to the Texas Redistricting Board as laid out by state law when the legislature fails to produce plans (the board was 4-1 Republican, if reconstituted today, it would be 5-0) which submitted district plans to the justice department and the courts. The Texas House and Senate plans were approved by both, although the judges tinkered a little with the House plan for some Voting Rights Act concerns.

However, the Congressional Map proposed by the redistricting board was compared to a map that the judges ordered then attorney general John Cornyn to produce that was an "incumbent protection plan." The judges tinkered with the "incumbent protection plan" while ignoring the Redistricting Board's work. No Texas elected offical (including the Redistricting Board) had a voice in the current Congressional districts.

This is the first legislative redistricting in Texas this decade, despite Democratic carping. They did not get the job done in 2001 when they still held one part of the legislature (and that was the part that got nothing done). They saw the electoral writing on the wall and threw it to the courts.

Thus the Democratic game plan continues to be obstruction at every level. And they say that the Republicans are partisan? Cry me a river, build me a bridge, and get over it.

By: Dimitrios Stathopoulos

Dimitrios Stathopoulos — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000

To further add to David's comments, these new district lines are drawn up becuase of the last census and the only time the congressional districts can be redrawn in Texas is right after the census. It isn't this current adminstrations fault that it took them 3 years to do it.

The only way i can see this happening more often then once every 10 years is if the census is taken more frequently then once every 10 years or if Texas changes it's laws.

This will hurt the Dem's more then they realized, but then again that particlar party has never had a problem cutting off it's own nose to spite it's face.

By: Scrapulous

Scrapulous — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000

The US Constitution assigns the task of redistricting to state legislatures, and the US Supreme Court has ruled that completing that task less often than once each ten years (to correspond with each national Census) is constitutionally suspect. So state legislatures have a constitutional duty to redistrict after each Census.

As Mr. Block's post points out, the 77th Texas Legislature failed in that duty in 2001 because of partisan deadlock.

The voters of Texas cured the deadlock with the 2002 election by putting both chambers of the Texas Legislature into the hands of a single party, along with the top two executive offices. What's going on now in Austin is simply the completion of the State's once-per-decade duty to redistrict.

It's hugely ironic that the Democrats claim that the Republicans are trying to thwart democracy. In fact, redistricting -- including gerrymandering -- is small-d democracy at its most blunt, but it's democracy that's being practiced in Austin right now. This is indeed a fight about democracy -- but it's the Dems who are on the anti-democratic side of that fight.

---