Comments on: Did Kerry Have Debate Cheat Sheet?

By: WINIFRED F.F

WINIFRED F.F — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:46:25 +0000

POLITICS OF THE MEDIA.

By: Ensiben

Ensiben — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 23:53:59 +0000

It doesn't matter WHAT Kerry pulled out of his pocket - maybe it was Teresa's photo to remind him of the hell he has to pay at home if he loses. The big point is that he ignored the AGREED-UPON "RULES", which actually speaks, once again, to the innate and often questionable character of this man, and follows in line with everything we know of him. It's scary to consider what socialist surprises he will pull out of the hat for this country if his "forked-tongue" campaign rhetoric should blind enough folks to actually snag him the election?

By: Eric

Eric — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 22:15:23 +0000

Iâll keep it very simple so the DemocRATs can understandâ¦ A winner never cheats, and a CHEATER NEVER WINS.

By: Bush exposed

Bush exposed — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:49:17 +0000

View and fast forward this video to 1 hour 19 minutes and 45 seconds â you need to increase the size of the Real Player window to double size or full screen and it still wonât be as clear as it was on TV, but you can see the bulge that looks like a wire on Bushâs back underneath his suit coat as he leans over the podium:

rtsp://cspanrm.fplive.net/cspan/project/c04/c04093004_debate1.rm

The wire would be consistent with an earpiece in his right ear.

Also, others have noticed how Bush interrupted himself, apparently when getting a message from Rove:

âDuring the Presidential Debate Bush made what may be his most costly error- he exposed that heâs using an earpiece to help him answer debate questions.

In the middle of an answer bush said, "now let me finish" as if someone was interrupting him - yet nobody did - he was talking to the person in his earpiece.â

Watch the video at c-span at about 40 minutes and 30 seconds (fast forward) in the same video above.

By: Sean Gleeson

Sean Gleeson — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:33:30 +0000

We stand by our story
There have been challenges, on the Internet and elsewhere, to the authenticity of the newly unearthed John Kerry cheat sheet used in an exclusive news report by blog.gleeson.us yesterday.

Rather than argue with the substance of the charges in this r...

By: Hank Fenster

Hank Fenster — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:59:56 +0000

This issue is what you get when you have 32 pages of rules on how the debate is to be conducted. Post-debate, you get a swarm of partisan auditors trying to find the places the other guy "cheated." We may as well have the debates conducted by the IRS. Jesus.

By: carpeicthus

carpeicthus — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:56:22 +0000

McGehee: The cameras were under Fox News's oversight. Think they're in the tank for Kerry?

James: Come on. The people in the comments here may be overheated, but it's condescending and unfounded to say they're doing so out of ignorance. This is a non-issue, and a non-issue played up in such a way that it shows why political blogs of all stripes really do have huge problems as a primary news souce.

By: INDC Journal

INDC Journal — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:29:59 +0000

A Specific Thank You to James Joyner
For this: As I discovered from reading the comments and following the TrackBacks from my brief post on the subject, many people don't bother actually reading what's written before engaging in commentary on it. Yes. Thank you. You should see...

By: AnjinSan

AnjinSan — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 06:10:26 +0000

After America got to see the real gw bush stand up, I can see the rather desperate need for a diversion, hence the "Kerry cheated" story... Pretty sad that the President of the United States can't perform in a room that has not been sanatized in advance by karl rove. The "Kerry doctrine" nonsense is also rather obvious grasping at straws... even a reading of Kerry's remarks on the bush blog show that he was referring to an after the fact "global test". BTW I appreciate the open-mindedness of this blog. I have been banned from many bush blogs. Spreading freedom thru censorship I suppose...

By: The Moderate Voice

The Moderate Voice — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 04:30:40 +0000

A Trip To Mars Or Sour Grapes City
Congradulations Matt Drudge: it looks like you have joined Dennis Kucinich and Alan Keyes on Mars. God will punish me for linking to the above post, which has been carried and considered seriously on some blogs, big and small.

By: Brew

Brew — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 04:01:23 +0000

Kerry spent the entire debate taking notes, a practice that he likely learned as a trial lawyer that can both make him appear focused, and help him organize his thoughts. Also - to even think that Kerry needed a crib sheet - come on - the Bush camp has spent the last three weeks trying to convince us that Kerry's debating skills make him the second coming of - well . . . whoever.

If you wanna start your own rumors, check out the strange crease (wire?) running down the president's back. Of course had HE cheated, I would think they woulda done a better job.

By: Bruce H.

Bruce H. — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:11:36 +0000

If notes wouldn't do any good, why did both sides agree not to use them?

By: DrudgeFan

DrudgeFan — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 01:54:28 +0000

I could see clearly what Kerry pulled out of his jacket pocket. It was an inspirational photo of that intern he was banging.

By: Joe Gandelman

Joe Gandelman — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 01:42:55 +0000

I'm boiling over Drudge's latest. I can't for the life of me see how blogs can even link to him anymore. His "scoops" such as Hillary "rocking the political world" by becoming Kerry's Vice Presidential candidate often seem political plants. This one is outrageous and reeks of the worst apparent political sour grapes. On the left you have some loonies suggesting Bush was wearing an earpiece during the debate. If so, whoever advised him needs to be fired. Now on the right you have Drudge suggesting there is a "mystery." To WHO? To Drudge. I watched the debate live and twice on tape. I read a ton of stuff on it and did The Mother Of All Roundups on my blog. Kerry was simply better prepared for the debate than Bush -- something that I can guarentee you we will not see in the remaining debates. I think, folks, I'm so angry because this campaign looks like it is finally getting down to ISSUE rather than these side issue distractions that center on personalities (earphones...cheat sheets...military records of both candidates). As someone who doesn't belong to either party I find these kinds of things are what will tip me over when I vote. I agree with each party on different aspects of their platforms. So when I vote I will vote for the campaign that has run the least sleazy campaign and that had the least sleazy backers. As a former journalist I can tell you that it would be a GREAT story to break if a candidate cheated during the debate. No one broke it for a reason -- just as no one broke the great news Hillary would be running with Kerry for a reason. I now have a rule on my modest little blog: if Drudge has a scoop I usually wait until I see a wire service or a paper has carried it (and that can be the Washington Times). I won't do a breathless post on one of his scoopes. This one truly reeks of trying to find a reason to discredit Kerry since Bush didn't prepare adequately for this one. He now joins Dennis Kucinich and Alan Keyes on Mars. Of course I can be wrong on this...but I doubt it. It sounds like the story line for talk radio this week (better than the story line about the debate itself and the latest see-saw polls showing the debate may have helped Kerry).

By: McGehee

McGehee — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:49:16 +0000

What are the odds that Kerry would cheat in front of all those cameras and reporters? Vanishingly small, I think.

Before the CBS memo hoax, I might have agreed -- but everyone has to know the cameras and reporters might as well belong to the Kerry campaign. Even Kerry.

That said, I don't consider this story worth covering. If there ever gets to be actual evidence -- other than a fax from Abilene -- then I might reconsider. But even then, true or not, I just don't see it having the impact that Drudge's coverage would imply.