<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dixie Chicks Claim Anti-Bush Ad Rejected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tash</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102814</link>
		<dc:creator>tash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102814</guid>
		<description>there is such thing as freedom of speech! that&#039;s what makes these women role models! they are not afraid to say what they feel. better then having a fack persona and having people idolize someone they are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is such thing as freedom of speech! that's what makes these women role models! they are not afraid to say what they feel. better then having a fack persona and having people idolize someone they are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The COLOSSUS OF RHODEY</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102214</link>
		<dc:creator>The COLOSSUS OF RHODEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102214</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dix Chicks whine about &quot;censorship&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Or is it their cunning movie backers, the Weinstein brothers? James Joyner notes that NBC is rejecting the claim that a Dixie Chicks TV spot critical of President Bush was refused: The spot was not declined. In fact, we were......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dix Chicks whine about "censorship"...</strong></p>
<p>Or is it their cunning movie backers, the Weinstein brothers? James Joyner notes that NBC is rejecting the claim that a Dixie Chicks TV spot critical of President Bush was refused: The spot was not declined. In fact, we were......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the Heck was I Thinking!? :: Dixie Chicks - If People Don&#8217;t Buy Our Records, It&#8217;s Censorship! :: October :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102209</link>
		<dc:creator>What the Heck was I Thinking!? :: Dixie Chicks - If People Don&#8217;t Buy Our Records, It&#8217;s Censorship! :: October :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102209</guid>
		<description>[...] The Dissing Chicks (otherwise known as the Dixie Chicks) think that if people don&#8217;t buy their music, it must be government censorship. Everyone knows their fans can&#8217;t live without the girls&#8217; music. Outside The Beltway has a post, Dixie Chicks Claim Anti-Bush Ad Rejected in which he notes:  Watching multi-millionaires whine about being ostracized by their fans after having gone out of their way to alienate them is, shall we say, less than gripping.  I guess that while the chicks were learning about politics they weren&#8217;t learning anything about free market capitalism, in which the customer can buy what they want and not buy what they don&#8217;t want for whatever reason.      Comments &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Dissing Chicks (otherwise known as the Dixie Chicks) think that if people don&#8217;t buy their music, it must be government censorship. Everyone knows their fans can&#8217;t live without the girls&#8217; music. Outside The Beltway has a post, Dixie Chicks Claim Anti-Bush Ad Rejected in which he notes:  Watching multi-millionaires whine about being ostracized by their fans after having gone out of their way to alienate them is, shall we say, less than gripping.  I guess that while the chicks were learning about politics they weren&#8217;t learning anything about free market capitalism, in which the customer can buy what they want and not buy what they don&#8217;t want for whatever reason.      Comments &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102207</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102207</guid>
		<description>An image/text ad is showing up at &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hot Air&lt;/a&gt; for their movie.  And you &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; there are more Bush foreign policy fans at Hot Air than at NBC.  I guess that&#039;s new-media vs. old-media for you.

&lt;blockquote&gt;First, this is not a movie I have any interest in seeing. Watching multi-millionaires whine about being ostracized by their fans after having gone out of their way to alienate them is, shall we say, less than gripping.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My thoughts exactly.  But if they want to spend their millions promoting a for-profit video complaint about how people won&#039;t pay to listen to them... that has too much comedic value to reject.  That&#039;s the epitome of millionaire brat stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An image/text ad is showing up at <a href="http://hotair.com/" rel="nofollow">Hot Air</a> for their movie.  And you <em>know</em> there are more Bush foreign policy fans at Hot Air than at NBC.  I guess that's new-media vs. old-media for you.</p>
<blockquote><p>First, this is not a movie I have any interest in seeing. Watching multi-millionaires whine about being ostracized by their fans after having gone out of their way to alienate them is, shall we say, less than gripping.</p></blockquote>
<p>My thoughts exactly.  But if they want to spend their millions promoting a for-profit video complaint about how people won't pay to listen to them... that has too much comedic value to reject.  That's the epitome of millionaire brat stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102174</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102174</guid>
		<description>Good to see the Dixie Chicks are still taking the&#039;o&#039; out of country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see the Dixie Chicks are still taking the'o' out of country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102131</link>
		<dc:creator>just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102131</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have to see the trailer to know this isn&#039;t a movie that would interest me, much for the same reasons.

The Dixie Chicks real mistake was that they forgot who their fan base was, and when they pissed off their fan base, rather than making apologies they blamed their fan base for being stupid.  Not exactly a good way to keep the career going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't have to see the trailer to know this isn't a movie that would interest me, much for the same reasons.</p>
<p>The Dixie Chicks real mistake was that they forgot who their fan base was, and when they pissed off their fan base, rather than making apologies they blamed their fan base for being stupid.  Not exactly a good way to keep the career going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anchoress &#187; Great Pumpkins, Bad Art and More</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102108</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anchoress &#187; Great Pumpkins, Bad Art and More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102108</guid>
		<description>[...] The Dixie Chicks were never my cuppa. They are now chattering on about being silenced. Funny how that happens, isn&#8217;t it? Tim Robbins got to write and perform in a play about how he was being silenced by the &#8220;chill wind&#8221; of the Bushies, and now the Chicks are chattering all over the place. That&#8217;s some funny sort of silencing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Dixie Chicks were never my cuppa. They are now chattering on about being silenced. Funny how that happens, isn&#8217;t it? Tim Robbins got to write and perform in a play about how he was being silenced by the &#8220;chill wind&#8221; of the Bushies, and now the Chicks are chattering all over the place. That&#8217;s some funny sort of silencing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gar swafur</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102103</link>
		<dc:creator>gar swafur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102103</guid>
		<description>the Dixie Chicks? who is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Dixie Chicks? who is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Punish Me, Too</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102099</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Punish Me, Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102099</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: James Joyner reports that NBC denies they were asked to run the ads. In other words, this is looking more and more like apublicity stunt. Riehl World View: Who cares? Say Anything: Give me a break - staged. Just go take the cure for Dixie Chickitis. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: James Joyner reports that NBC denies they were asked to run the ads. In other words, this is looking more and more like apublicity stunt. Riehl World View: Who cares? Say Anything: Give me a break - staged. Just go take the cure for Dixie Chickitis. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102092</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102092</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dumb and Dumber...&lt;/strong&gt;

That&#039;s why I think it&#039;s part of a plan to increase exposure without running the ads. And it&#039;s not a bad strategy either. It increases the exposure at no cost to the studio....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dumb and Dumber...</strong></p>
<p>That's why I think it's part of a plan to increase exposure without running the ads. And it's not a bad strategy either. It increases the exposure at no cost to the studio....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Political Pit Bull</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-102083</link>
		<dc:creator>The Political Pit Bull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-102083</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I Second That Motion...&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;Let&#039;s just all pack up and move to Canada because this isn&#039;t our country anymore.&quot; That&#039;s John Avarosis&#039;s petulant response to NBC&#039;s decision not to air ads for the new Dixie Chicks documentary, &quot;Shut up and Sing&quot;--which, by the way,......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I Second That Motion...</strong></p>
<p>"Let's just all pack up and move to Canada because this isn't our country anymore." That's John Avarosis's petulant response to NBC's decision not to air ads for the new Dixie Chicks documentary, "Shut up and Sing"--which, by the way,......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  » Gone Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-131761</link>
		<dc:creator> » Gone Hollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-131761</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; for as long as I can remember, yet they continue to go to the movies. And it’s unlikely that people will quit buying Toby Keith and Gretchen Wilson albums to teach the Grammy people a lesson.  Related stories below the fold:   Dixie Chicks Claim Anti-Bush Ad Rejected  Dixie Chicks Move to Canada  Dixie Chicks Tour Struggling  Dixie Chicks Bush-Whacked?  Dixie Chicks New CD, Taking The Long Way, Breaks Records  Dixie Chicks Dis The View  Dixie Chicks Not Ready to Make Nice&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> for as long as I can remember, yet they continue to go to the movies. And it&rsquo;s unlikely that people will quit buying Toby Keith and Gretchen Wilson albums to teach the Grammy people a lesson.  Related stories below the fold:   Dixie Chicks Claim Anti-Bush Ad Rejected  Dixie Chicks Move to Canada  Dixie Chicks Tour Struggling  Dixie Chicks Bush-Whacked?  Dixie Chicks New CD, Taking The Long Way, Breaks Records  Dixie Chicks Dis The View  Dixie Chicks Not Ready to Make Nice<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxedOutMama</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-131762</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxedOutMama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-131762</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;The Dixie Chicks were never my cuppa. They are now chattering on about being silenced. Funny how that happens, isn’t it? Tim Robbins got to write and perform in a play about how he was being silenced by the “chill wind” of the Bushies, and now the Chicks are chattering all over the place. That’s some funny sort of silencing.Ah, Anchoress, I know the answer to that one. In the Cheeping Chickie leftist world, &quot;being silenced&quot; means not being greeted with roars of approval when you speak. It has nothing to do with the&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->The Dixie Chicks were never my cuppa. They are now chattering on about being silenced. Funny how that happens, isn&rsquo;t it? Tim Robbins got to write and perform in a play about how he was being silenced by the “chill wind” of the Bushies, and now the Chicks are chattering all over the place. That&rsquo;s some funny sort of silencing.Ah, Anchoress, I know the answer to that one. In the Cheeping Chickie leftist world, "being silenced" means not being greeted with roars of approval when you speak. It has nothing to do with the<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Blog on National Review Online</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-131763</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Blog on National Review Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/dixie_chicks_claim_anti-bush_ad_rejected/#comment-131763</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Corporate media censorship or provocateurs&#039; publicity stunt? James Joyner is pretty sure it&#039;s the latter.  UPDATE: George Gooding notices some similarities between the latest Dixie Chicks &quot;outrage&quot; and phony accusations of censorship over Fahrenheit 9/11. Are the Weinsteins crying wolf again?Take Our Press Corps... Please!&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Corporate media censorship or provocateurs' publicity stunt? James Joyner is pretty sure it's the latter.  UPDATE: George Gooding notices some similarities between the latest Dixie Chicks "outrage" and phony accusations of censorship over Fahrenheit 9/11. Are the Weinsteins crying wolf again?Take Our Press Corps... Please!<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
