Comments on: Do You, Party A, Take Party B to be Your Lawfully Wedded …

By: Bithead

Bithead — Sat, 31 May 2008 02:22:48 +0000

Humor, remember?
Stolen movie line....
Oh, never mind.

By: Michael

Michael — Fri, 30 May 2008 16:09:16 +0000

Observant, isn't he?

Yay, you got your Ad Hominem in on this thread too, feel better now Bit?

By: Michael

Michael — Fri, 30 May 2008 16:07:33 +0000

Or maybe - just maybe - I was making fun of the typo in the article that James linked to.

Sheesh.

Heh, didn't even see that, sorry.

By: Bithead

Bithead — Fri, 30 May 2008 15:17:13 +0000

Bobert:

Observant, isn't he?

By: Bobbert

Bobbert — Fri, 30 May 2008 15:14:02 +0000

I didn't realize that inanimate objects could be party to a civil legal contract.

Oh wait, maybe you're the one who's wrong.

Or maybe - just maybe - I was making fun of the typo in the article that James linked to.

Sheesh.

By: Bithead

Bithead — Fri, 30 May 2008 00:05:09 +0000

Sarcasm is giving a sharp edge to a blunt truth,and is only one of the many services I offer.

By: William d'Inger

William d'Inger — Thu, 29 May 2008 20:46:13 +0000

Indeed, but this is the bridge to the future, after all.

Maybe you ought to lighten up on the sarcasm. No telling what angie-san thinks of bridgophobics. Which makes me wonder what you get when you scratch your angie.

By: Bithead

Bithead — Thu, 29 May 2008 20:29:45 +0000

I ... *ahem* ... *cough* ... DID take first place last time.

That's another reason.

Of course, I've never been plastered all over the bottom of the barrel

Yeah, well.... (Toe in the sand) You know...

By: William d'Inger

William d'Inger — Thu, 29 May 2008 20:18:01 +0000

Rodney, you've GOTTA get this guy more active in the caption contests.

I ... *ahem* ... *cough* ... DID take first place last time. Of course, I've never been plastered all over the bottom of the barrel.

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 29 May 2008 19:54:16 +0000

Good. Once you let people marry bridges who knows what that could lead to.

I didn't realize that inanimate objects could be party to a civil legal contract.

Oh wait, maybe you're the one who's wrong.

By: Bithead

Bithead — Thu, 29 May 2008 19:51:05 +0000

Slippery slope, indeed.

Indeed, but this is the bridge to the future, after all.

By: Bithead

Bithead — Thu, 29 May 2008 19:49:22 +0000

"tying the knot".

(Wince.) Rodney, you've GOTTA get this guy more active in the caption contests.

By: Bobbert

Bobbert — Thu, 29 May 2008 19:36:09 +0000

New marriage license forms also will include lines for “Party A” and “Party B” instead of bridge and groom.

Good. Once you let people marry bridges who knows what that could lead to.

Slippery slope, indeed.

By: William d'Inger

William d'Inger — Thu, 29 May 2008 19:35:47 +0000

They have a name for folks with no sense of humor... Bureaucrats.

Since we're on the subject, I forgot to mention above that the two tab/no slot combo gives a whole new meaning to "tying the knot".

By: Bithead

Bithead — Thu, 29 May 2008 19:22:47 +0000

You know what they say William, scratch a homophobe, find a scared boy in the closet...

They have a name for folks with no sense of humor... Bureaucrats.