<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dummies Guarding Iraq Garrison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:06:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/comment-page-1/#comment-109175</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/#comment-109175</guid>
		<description>Jeremy Bentham came up with this idea about 200 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy Bentham came up with this idea about 200 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/comment-page-1/#comment-109174</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/#comment-109174</guid>
		<description>Wow. For the second time in two days I find myself agreeing with Steven. While I think it is important to report on things like units being sent out unable to perform their missions - just so pressure can be put on the Powers That Be to actually outfit units properly - even a lefty like me gets itchy at the idea of printing specific tactics like this; especially tactics that require misdirection to keep the troops safe. This story shouldn&#039;t have gone through...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. For the second time in two days I find myself agreeing with Steven. While I think it is important to report on things like units being sent out unable to perform their missions - just so pressure can be put on the Powers That Be to actually outfit units properly - even a lefty like me gets itchy at the idea of printing specific tactics like this; especially tactics that require misdirection to keep the troops safe. This story shouldn't have gone through...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick T. McGuire</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/comment-page-1/#comment-109164</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick T. McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/#comment-109164</guid>
		<description>Dummies, huh!!! How do you tell the difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dummies, huh!!! How do you tell the difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Plunk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/comment-page-1/#comment-109129</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Plunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/#comment-109129</guid>
		<description>I wonder if manpower problems would have been reported during WWII in the same manner?  Reports of fake armaments dotting the English countryside in order to fool NAZI Germany before D-day were never published from what I have read.

I guess the English press figures letting the insurgents know that many of the guards in the towers are fake is no big deal.

We let them know our war plans, we let them know our troop strength, what&#039;s next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if manpower problems would have been reported during WWII in the same manner?  Reports of fake armaments dotting the English countryside in order to fool NAZI Germany before D-day were never published from what I have read.</p>
<p>I guess the English press figures letting the insurgents know that many of the guards in the towers are fake is no big deal.</p>
<p>We let them know our war plans, we let them know our troop strength, what's next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/comment-page-1/#comment-109107</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/#comment-109107</guid>
		<description>&quot;does anyone know what percentage of the Guards’ force 47 men is?&quot;

Well normal strength would be around 550-600[1], so around 7% of their normal strength. However if there had been secondments from another battalion then these probably wouldn&#039;t have been counted in the guards strength but counted on the strength of their home battalion. And most battalions will be technically under establishtment strength at any given moment anyway due to training,secondments,illness etc.
 
I suspect than given there&#039;s 2,500 troops based at Shaibah a shortfall of 47 guardsmen isn&#039;t really the reason for using fake guards.  

[1] A guards battalion will normally be  around 100 men higher than this as they  have a company for &#039;public duties&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"does anyone know what percentage of the Guards&rsquo; force 47 men is?"</p>
<p>Well normal strength would be around 550-600[1], so around 7% of their normal strength. However if there had been secondments from another battalion then these probably wouldn't have been counted in the guards strength but counted on the strength of their home battalion. And most battalions will be technically under establishtment strength at any given moment anyway due to training,secondments,illness etc.</p>
<p>I suspect than given there's 2,500 troops based at Shaibah a shortfall of 47 guardsmen isn't really the reason for using fake guards.  </p>
<p>[1] A guards battalion will normally be  around 100 men higher than this as they  have a company for 'public duties'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/comment-page-1/#comment-109091</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/#comment-109091</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be more concerned that they were sent out without the manpower necessary to perform their mission - does anyone know what percentage of the Guards&#039; force 47 men is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd be more concerned that they were sent out without the manpower necessary to perform their mission - does anyone know what percentage of the Guards' force 47 men is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veeshir</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/comment-page-1/#comment-109082</link>
		<dc:creator>Veeshir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/dummies_guarding_iraq_garrison/#comment-109082</guid>
		<description>They stole that from Beau Geste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They stole that from Beau Geste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
