Elitism Redux
 |
James Joyner | Friday, October 7, 2005 |
Apropos the discussion here yesterday about elitism and the conservative opinionmaker opposition to Harriet Miers, Duncan Black provides an insightful commentary.
Lots of discussion in wingnuttia about whether or not it’s “elitist” to oppose Miers. These discussions seem to confuse different kinds of elitism. There’s one kind of elitism which dares to suggest that smart qualified people should get the kinds of jobs that require smart qualified people. This seems to be perfectly reasonable.
The other type of elitism is the one which focuses on pedigrees and certificates. One must come from the right family and go to the right school.
His follow-on discussion about the merits of the latter is spot-on.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- That’s What I Call A Loophole…
- Obama “Keeping An Eye” On Robots
- Phil Carter Quits Administration
- Census Worker Hanging Suicide, Not Right Wing Murder
- Swine flu is more popular than Dodd
- Paradox of Choice Paradoxically Untrue
- Private Forecasters Support Claim That Stimulus Worked
- Entertaining Kids During the Holidays
- How Much Will Escalation Cost?
- No Party of No
- Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with Bush Defends Court Pick, Iraq Progress
I think that the Ivies and comparably elite schools do attract the bulk of talent at the very top -- look at Stanford's incredible run of consecutive Nobel prizes, for example. People falsely generalize from these highly publicized facts to the erroneous idea that _all_ Ivy graduates are intelligent or accomplished, which is manifestly not the case.
Sure. But the success of the Ivies is mostly in identifying and attracting the best and the brightest, not in creating them.
I don't know what's worse: the fact that you linked favorably to something Atrios wrote, or the fact that I agree that what he wrote made sense.
Hell, it wasn't even vile.
Comments are Closed
