<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyone&#8217;s a Beltway Insider Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/everyones_a_beltway_insider_now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/everyones_a_beltway_insider_now/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:17:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/everyones_a_beltway_insider_now/comment-page-1/#comment-290435</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/everyones_a_beltway_insider_now/#comment-290435</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For one, these sites are all devoted exclusively to the horse race; look elsewhere if you want to know what the candidates might do about the trade imbalance with China.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not so sure, on this point. I mean, if the cadidates are talking about it, someone in the sphere is, too. Blogs, as I&#039;ve said previously, are reactionary, in that they tend to work with what is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For one, these sites are all devoted exclusively to the horse race; look elsewhere if you want to know what the candidates might do about the trade imbalance with China.</p></blockquote>
<p>I'm not so sure, on this point. I mean, if the cadidates are talking about it, someone in the sphere is, too. Blogs, as I've said previously, are reactionary, in that they tend to work with what is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimPanzee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/everyones_a_beltway_insider_now/comment-page-1/#comment-290362</link>
		<dc:creator>JimPanzee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/everyones_a_beltway_insider_now/#comment-290362</guid>
		<description>And, how much less homogenous was it when we had access only to the NYT, our hometown newspaper, and three/four news channels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, how much less homogenous was it when we had access only to the NYT, our hometown newspaper, and three/four news channels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Animal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/everyones_a_beltway_insider_now/comment-page-1/#comment-290315</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/everyones_a_beltway_insider_now/#comment-290315</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;We Are All Insiders Now...&lt;/strong&gt;

WE ARE ALL INSIDERS NOW....Lee Gomes writes in the Wall Street Journal that the wide availability of insider political sites (The Note, The Page, First Read, etc.) has made us all into slaves of Beltway horserace analysis and MSM conventional......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We Are All Insiders Now...</strong></p>
<p>WE ARE ALL INSIDERS NOW....Lee Gomes writes in the Wall Street Journal that the wide availability of insider political sites (The Note, The Page, First Read, etc.) has made us all into slaves of Beltway horserace analysis and MSM conventional......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
