Bullshit.

What she said was that being a Black man in the Democratic primary was an advantage over being a White woman.

If you take a look at the demographics she is right.

She said it was being an advantage over being a white woman or a white man. Which explains why there have been so many Democratic presidential nominees ...

That out of the way, we can stretch our minds a bit, to an election whrere Hillary Clinton isn't involved.

Let's imagine the white woman running, isnt Hillary, but some other nameless face. Or, hell, since Ferraro is the subject let's imagine she's 30 years younger, and run her, instead.

At that point we have a Democrat race between a black man and a white Woman. The black man wins. WHy? Because Blacks have been on the Democrat 'protected species' list for a heckova lot longer than women. More, most of the politics surrounding woment were borrowed from the issues invoked by Democrats ostensibly in support of Blacks.

What I'm suggesting here is the black guy wins because the Democrats have been identified... (Incorrectly) with working for Blacks a lot longer than they've been identified (incorrectly) as working in the interests of women. It's a self-identification thing much as anything else, by now.

Blacks are just another special interest group that libs wheel out during election time.

Their cures (do they really want a cure?) for the black delima was to destroy their family and integrity by making them wards of whitey through the welfare state known first as the Great Society"

Sadly the black coummities bought into the permanent victimhood mentlity necessary to justify to themselves the acceptance of the idea that they can't make it without big government. care.

Bullshit.

What she said was that being a Black man in the Democratic primary was an advantage over being a White woman.

If you take a look at the demographics she is right.

She's right that the attempt to redefine racism as something that can only be done by the dominant race (white in the case of the US) is basically silly, but that kind of got drowned out by how crazy her statement suggesting blacks are advantaged compared to whites in America.

I'd think there is a difference between complaining about a insert any color man, and complaining about a [insert any other adjective] man.

Still holds true, if someone is complaining about a white man, I'd assume their complaint revolved around him being white.

For example, you were to complain about the liberal running for President, the implication is that your complaint revolves around them being liberal.

Lacking any other specifics in the complaint, if someone said they were complaining about insert any color man, I'd also assume their complaint revolved around him being that color.

For example, you were to complain about the liberal running for President, the implication is that your complaint revolves around them being liberal.

Lacking any other specifics in the complaint, if someone said they were complaining about a black man, I'd also assume their complaint revolved around him being black.

The Obama campaign has at no time and in no way blamed criticism of him on racism when that criticism was not related to the color of his skin. And frankly, even when it has been, they've been pretty muted.

This is a rewrite of history.