Expanding the Security Council?
 |
James Joyner | Thursday, September 25, 2008 |
French and EU President Nicolas Sarkozy issued a call from the floor of the UN yesterday to expand the Security Council and G8. Declaring that, “The 21st century world cannot be governed with the institutions of the 20th century,” he argued that inclusion of today’s emerging powers is not just “a matter fairness” but a necessary condition for “being able to act effectively.” “We cannot wait any longer to enlarge the Security Council. We cannot wait any longer to turn the G8 into the G13 or G14 and to bring in China, India, South Africa, Mexico and Brazil,” said Sarkozy.
In “Expand the Security Council? Non. The G8? Qui,” I explain why that proposal is only half bad.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- Expanding the Security Council?
- G8 and EU Growing Pains
- New Term Nonpermanent Seats on the UNSC
- What If? (China invades Vietnam edition)
- Caption Contest Winners
- America and the World After Bush: Economics and Globalization
- Jim Jones Outstanding National Security Advisor Choice
- South African Nuclear Plant Attacked
- Haggling With the Iranians
- North Korea Conducts Nuclear Test
- Nathalie Blanchard Facebook Smile Leaves Her Depressed
- Glenn Beck, Community Organizer
- OTB Latenight – Cherry Poppin’ Daddies
- Hacked Climate Scientists Emails Reveal Truth
- Obama, the Recession, and Polls
- Giuliani Running for Senate, Not Governor
- OTB Latenight – The Jesus & Mary Chain
- Fox Fake Crowd Videos
- Congress to Investigate Fake Districts
- Douthat Blogging Again
Dude, the link is busted.
With regard to the security council--do away with it. Sarko is right that it is anachronistic, but expansion ain't gonna help. The UN needs full-scale institutional changes.
Fixed!
Do away with the Security Council and have full democracy. The first vote will be to revoke Israel's sovereignty.
I think the whole thing needs fixing.
Although I do think there is an argument to be made for India to be on the council and at least one of the Central or South American countries, but I don't think expanding the security council will fix what is broken with the UN.
I think they ought to reform the entire nature of the Security Council and the basis for membership on it.
It is fundamentally a security organization, so the basis for membership on it should be due to either military power (although I don't know how you'd measure it - the top ten spenders?) or economic power, or an index made of both.
India in that context makes sense, and to an extent Japan does as well along with Germany (not because Germany has a big military, but it is a big economy, and Japan spends a lot both on its military and has a big economy). Brazil has neither, with no worldwide force projection, and Nigeria especially does not.
