<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fat Headed Voters?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fat_headed_voters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fat_headed_voters/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:18:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fat_headed_voters/comment-page-1/#comment-18273</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6383#comment-18273</guid>
		<description>Er, anyone note that the correlation graph came off a French website? Not that that means anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, anyone note that the correlation graph came off a French website? Not that that means anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fat_headed_voters/comment-page-1/#comment-18274</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6383#comment-18274</guid>
		<description>Or that the correlation is completely spurious.  With all the data out there, and all the people downloading it and looking at it, we are bound to get some bogus correlations that are statistically significant.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or that the correlation is completely spurious.  With all the data out there, and all the people downloading it and looking at it, we are bound to get some bogus correlations that are statistically significant.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
