<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FBI Raid on Jefferson&#8217;s Office Unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:16:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-141088</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-141088</guid>
		<description>Bit,
According to you Reagan and Bush are the Center and Clinton is the left?  Where is the right in your universe?

Bush 41 and Clinton were center right and center left respectively.  Clinton was certainly not ideologically or by policy further from the center than was Bush 41.  If Bush 41 was further to the right than Clinton was to the left it was not by much.  Reagan&#039;s policies were further from the center than either of their&#039;s, but had the charisma and discipline to push them through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit,<br />
According to you Reagan and Bush are the Center and Clinton is the left?  Where is the right in your universe?</p>
<p>Bush 41 and Clinton were center right and center left respectively.  Clinton was certainly not ideologically or by policy further from the center than was Bush 41.  If Bush 41 was further to the right than Clinton was to the left it was not by much.  Reagan's policies were further from the center than either of their's, but had the charisma and discipline to push them through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-141062</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-141062</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry, Rogers issued the ruling, not Ginsburg. Still it&#039;s 2 Republican appointees and one Democrat.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Two centerists and a leftist.
What passes for balance, today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sorry, Rogers issued the ruling, not Ginsburg. Still it's 2 Republican appointees and one Democrat.</p></blockquote>
<p>Two centerists and a leftist.<br />
What passes for balance, today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatHMV</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-140970</link>
		<dc:creator>PatHMV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-140970</guid>
		<description>As I discuss &lt;a href=&quot;http://stubbornfacts.us/domestic_policy/crime/an_impractical_decision_on_jefferson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, I think the concurring opinion is much better than (and dramatically at odds with) the majority opinion. The majority blithely tosses off a couple of hypothetical processes that the FBI could follow to search a Congressman&#039;s office, but they all either implicitly assume an honest Congressman working in good faith to assert only warranted privileges, or would ultimately force the FBI to blindly seize all computers and file cabinets and bring them to the judge to review for privilege. The majority opinion would be utterly impractical to follow in real life, where a crooked Congressman could very easily stash the smoking gun letter showing his guilt in an envelope marked &quot;memos debating legislation with other congressmen.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I discuss <a href="http://stubbornfacts.us/domestic_policy/crime/an_impractical_decision_on_jefferson" rel="nofollow">here</a>, I think the concurring opinion is much better than (and dramatically at odds with) the majority opinion. The majority blithely tosses off a couple of hypothetical processes that the FBI could follow to search a Congressman's office, but they all either implicitly assume an honest Congressman working in good faith to assert only warranted privileges, or would ultimately force the FBI to blindly seize all computers and file cabinets and bring them to the judge to review for privilege. The majority opinion would be utterly impractical to follow in real life, where a crooked Congressman could very easily stash the smoking gun letter showing his guilt in an envelope marked "memos debating legislation with other congressmen."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-140964</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-140964</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Indeed. I haven&#039;t seen much specific about the warrant, but if this was so blatantly unconctitutional, you&#039;d think that would have come up when the warrant was being signed by a judge...&lt;/blockquote&gt;From skimming the ruling, it seemed that the warrant was issued to seize unprivileged information, while the FBI took privileged information as well.  Only the privileged information is having to be returned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Indeed. I haven't seen much specific about the warrant, but if this was so blatantly unconctitutional, you'd think that would have come up when the warrant was being signed by a judge...</p></blockquote>
<p>From skimming the ruling, it seemed that the warrant was issued to seize unprivileged information, while the FBI took privileged information as well.  Only the privileged information is having to be returned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-140963</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-140963</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ginsburg issued the ruling.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Sorry, Rogers issued the ruling, not Ginsburg.  Still it&#039;s 2 Republican appointees and one Democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ginsburg issued the ruling.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, Rogers issued the ruling, not Ginsburg.  Still it's 2 Republican appointees and one Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-140962</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-140962</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lemme guess... the judge who issued the rling was an Clinton Appointee.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Judges were:

Chief Judge:
Ginsburg (1986 - Reagan)

Circuit Judges:
Henderson (1990 - Bush Senior)
Rogers (1994 - Clinton)

Ginsburg issued the ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lemme guess... the judge who issued the rling was an Clinton Appointee.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Judges were:</p>
<p>Chief Judge:<br />
Ginsburg (1986 - Reagan)</p>
<p>Circuit Judges:<br />
Henderson (1990 - Bush Senior)<br />
Rogers (1994 - Clinton)</p>
<p>Ginsburg issued the ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-140954</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-140954</guid>
		<description>...well get that man a commitee chairman job!!!...c&#039;mon Nancy, what&#039;s the holdup?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...well get that man a commitee chairman job!!!...c'mon Nancy, what's the holdup?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-140950</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-140950</guid>
		<description>Lemme guess... the judge who issued the rling was an Clinton Appointee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lemme guess... the judge who issued the rling was an Clinton Appointee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-140945</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/fbi_raid_on_jeffersons_office_unconstitutional/#comment-140945</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A bizarre ruling, given that the raid was executed pursuant to a warrant under an ongoing criminal investigation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Indeed. I haven&#039;t seen much specific about the warrant, but if this was so blatantly unconctitutional, you&#039;d think that would have come up when the warrant was being &lt;em&gt;signed by a judge...&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A bizarre ruling, given that the raid was executed pursuant to a warrant under an ongoing criminal investigation.</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed. I haven't seen much specific about the warrant, but if this was so blatantly unconctitutional, you'd think that would have come up when the warrant was being <em>signed by a judge...</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
