<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feds Go After Star Wars Pirates, BitTorrent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:19:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: carlosc1dbz</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/comment-page-1/#comment-47665</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosc1dbz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 05:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10692#comment-47665</guid>
		<description>Well I would just like to say that it is really funny that all of the sudden the Goverment is getting involved, because Star Wars was out before it hit theaters.  Why didnt the goverment act like this twards any other movie that was out early on bittorrent?  Thats the question we should be asking.  I bet you anything that Lucas Films is probably paying the goverment to take action or something.  The goverment shouldn&#039;t try to take down bittorrent because someone tells it to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I would just like to say that it is really funny that all of the sudden the Goverment is getting involved, because Star Wars was out before it hit theaters.  Why didnt the goverment act like this twards any other movie that was out early on bittorrent?  Thats the question we should be asking.  I bet you anything that Lucas Films is probably paying the goverment to take action or something.  The goverment shouldn't try to take down bittorrent because someone tells it to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlosc1dbz</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/comment-page-1/#comment-47664</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosc1dbz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 05:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10692#comment-47664</guid>
		<description>Well I would just like to say that it is really funny that all of the sudden the Goverment is getting involved, because Star Wars was out before it hit theaters.  Why didnt the goverment act like this twards any other movie that was out early on bittorrent?  Thats the question we should be asking.  I bet you anything that Lucas Films is probably paying the goverment to take action or something.  The goverment should try to take down bittorrent because someone tells it to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I would just like to say that it is really funny that all of the sudden the Goverment is getting involved, because Star Wars was out before it hit theaters.  Why didnt the goverment act like this twards any other movie that was out early on bittorrent?  Thats the question we should be asking.  I bet you anything that Lucas Films is probably paying the goverment to take action or something.  The goverment should try to take down bittorrent because someone tells it to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/comment-page-1/#comment-47026</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 02:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10692#comment-47026</guid>
		<description>I suspect that the subset of people who would actually download a copy and the subset of people who will be seeing it multiple times in the theater anyway overlap to a large extent, if the first group isn&#039;t entirely included in the second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that the subset of people who would actually download a copy and the subset of people who will be seeing it multiple times in the theater anyway overlap to a large extent, if the first group isn't entirely included in the second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/comment-page-1/#comment-47023</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 01:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10692#comment-47023</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m being nitpicky, but it would be more semantically correct to say that BitTorrent is a technology commonly used to pirate material.  It&#039;s not a group of people.

The error would kind of like saying &quot;...going after cable, an entertainment watching group, ...&quot;. Cable is a technology used to distribute content to people who like to watch entertainment, it&#039;s not a &quot;group&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm being nitpicky, but it would be more semantically correct to say that BitTorrent is a technology commonly used to pirate material.  It's not a group of people.</p>
<p>The error would kind of like saying "...going after cable, an entertainment watching group, ...". Cable is a technology used to distribute content to people who like to watch entertainment, it's not a "group".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornfields</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/comment-page-1/#comment-47018</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornfields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10692#comment-47018</guid>
		<description>James,

BitTorrent is not a &quot;group.&quot;  Nor is it really the equivalent of Napster.  It is simply a very well written file transfer protocal.  It is being used to spread everything from Christian literature to Chomsky.  It would be a great way on this site, for example, to share a video w/ very little bandwith.  I am not saying that there is not a lot of piracy, but there is a lot of great stuff happening with it as well.  It is really beautifully though out code...  I use it legally for Soviet-era materials for teaching Russian history, which are available from Russian users.  There are also sites devoted devoted at least a half dozen provinces in China (more questionably legit, but it is hard to stick up for the Chinese on intellectual property) w/ regional Chinese television.  Shut down the Star Wars sharing, but don&#039;t let them trick you into shutting down the whole thing...  In fact, you guys should use it on this site to share documents and materials.

As for Napster, I think it was a shame it got shut down.  I did not condone the piracy, but I myself (and many hundreds if not thousands of others) used it legally to share pre-copyrighted music transferred directly from wax cylinders to mp3.  Much of this material never even made it onto 78.  Billy Murray, for example, was one of the most popular pre-WWI singers, and until a few years ago, there was not a single CD available of him online.  When the shut down napster, this whole early music phenomenon passed...  I couldn&#039;t care a lick about contemporary music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>BitTorrent is not a "group."  Nor is it really the equivalent of Napster.  It is simply a very well written file transfer protocal.  It is being used to spread everything from Christian literature to Chomsky.  It would be a great way on this site, for example, to share a video w/ very little bandwith.  I am not saying that there is not a lot of piracy, but there is a lot of great stuff happening with it as well.  It is really beautifully though out code...  I use it legally for Soviet-era materials for teaching Russian history, which are available from Russian users.  There are also sites devoted devoted at least a half dozen provinces in China (more questionably legit, but it is hard to stick up for the Chinese on intellectual property) w/ regional Chinese television.  Shut down the Star Wars sharing, but don't let them trick you into shutting down the whole thing...  In fact, you guys should use it on this site to share documents and materials.</p>
<p>As for Napster, I think it was a shame it got shut down.  I did not condone the piracy, but I myself (and many hundreds if not thousands of others) used it legally to share pre-copyrighted music transferred directly from wax cylinders to mp3.  Much of this material never even made it onto 78.  Billy Murray, for example, was one of the most popular pre-WWI singers, and until a few years ago, there was not a single CD available of him online.  When the shut down napster, this whole early music phenomenon passed...  I couldn't care a lick about contemporary music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/comment-page-1/#comment-47013</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 22:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10692#comment-47013</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve read about the copy though, it&#039;s in such poor quality that most likely those who download it would pay to go see the movie.  Part of the experience is seeing it in a sharp picture, not a hacked copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I've read about the copy though, it's in such poor quality that most likely those who download it would pay to go see the movie.  Part of the experience is seeing it in a sharp picture, not a hacked copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/comment-page-1/#comment-47008</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 21:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10692#comment-47008</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a plug-in available for WordPress 1.5.  Mark Jaquith of http://txfx.net/ installed it for me as part of the switchover.  He&#039;s at mark at txfx dot net.

Fair point on the advance buzz.  Still, whereas hearing a cool song will make me more likely to buy the CD, seeing the movie would ordinarily make me less likely to plunk down my shekels and see it at a theater.  Maybe I&#039;d get the DVD later, though, since that&#039;s a more convenient way to watch than on my computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a plug-in available for WordPress 1.5.  Mark Jaquith of <a href="http://txfx.net/" rel="nofollow">http://txfx.net/</a> installed it for me as part of the switchover.  He's at mark at txfx dot net.</p>
<p>Fair point on the advance buzz.  Still, whereas hearing a cool song will make me more likely to buy the CD, seeing the movie would ordinarily make me less likely to plunk down my shekels and see it at a theater.  Maybe I'd get the DVD later, though, since that's a more convenient way to watch than on my computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Henley</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/feds_go_after_/comment-page-1/#comment-47005</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Henley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 21:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10692#comment-47005</guid>
		<description>Oh man, where does the cool new comment interface come from?

Also, and on the subject, bittorrent seems to have HELPED the popularity of Battlestar Galactica and Doctor Who. At the LEAST, it&#039;s not hurting Star Wars. It probably helped generate the advance &quot;sucks much less than the previous two movies&quot; buzz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, where does the cool new comment interface come from?</p>
<p>Also, and on the subject, bittorrent seems to have HELPED the popularity of Battlestar Galactica and Doctor Who. At the LEAST, it's not hurting Star Wars. It probably helped generate the advance "sucks much less than the previous two movies" buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
