Comments on: Fifth Anniversary of the USS Cole Bombing

By: LJD

LJD — Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:07:07 +0000

Continue to remain vague, dodge the issue, don't elaborate. Perhaps your great strategy would have been a better course of action.

By: spencer

spencer — Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:09:04 +0000

Sorry, wouldn't want to confuse you with the facts.

By: LJD

LJD — Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:05:58 +0000

Spencer- yeah whatever.

Regardless of it's role in 9/11, it is clear Iraq is now a vital component in the GWOT. Regardless of your perpective on history, your thoughts on this war, or feelings about this administration. To ignore that is to ignore reality.

What is more disconcerting is how easily one can turn an attack on a U.S. Navy ship, and the rejoicing at the death of U.S. service members, into an unsolicited commentary about our role in Iraq. "You guys" are a bunch of broken records, with no insight into your worn-out, America hating B.S.

By: Jack Ehrlich

Jack Ehrlich — Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:48:35 +0000

Spenser, just how is it you know Iraq, or Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. Are you aware of where Mohammed Atta was prior to 9/11. Did you know about the Czech connection to Iraqi intel? Or are you just going to dismiss it out of hand because it does not fit with what you have been told is what happened. Remember, the 9/11 comission had some real flaws in it. Some of the people on the comission should have been held to testify before the comission. If there findings are the basis of your arguement, I suggest that is a flawed position.

By: spencer

spencer — Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:10:39 +0000

The measured attack sound like a good strategy.

But how does invading Iraq when it had nothing to do with 9/11 count as a "measured response"?