<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FILIBUSTERS REDUX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/filibusters_redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/filibusters_redux/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:23:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/filibusters_redux/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1931#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>The technical fact here is that TPA does not apply to treaties, but to trade agreements, which are legally distinct.

One might consider that a mere technicality, but this is a legislatively created category of international agreement and is, therefore, different (I would argue) than merely the rules of the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The technical fact here is that TPA does not apply to treaties, but to trade agreements, which are legally distinct.</p>
<p>One might consider that a mere technicality, but this is a legislatively created category of international agreement and is, therefore, different (I would argue) than merely the rules of the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/filibusters_redux/comment-page-1/#comment-1885</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1931#comment-1885</guid>
		<description>Sure.  I guess I do tend to consider these things technicalities, although I acknowledge that most of the executive bureaucracy is, in a sense, an unconstitutional delegation of Congressional authority. But trade agreements and executive agreements are, in all but name, treaties.  The only practical difference of which I&#039;m aware is the ease of abrogation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure.  I guess I do tend to consider these things technicalities, although I acknowledge that most of the executive bureaucracy is, in a sense, an unconstitutional delegation of Congressional authority. But trade agreements and executive agreements are, in all but name, treaties.  The only practical difference of which I'm aware is the ease of abrogation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/filibusters_redux/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1931#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>I think Executive Agreements are even less powerful than Trade Agreements, given that they expire with the given administration.

Do you know if there is specific legislative authority for EAs?  I am trying to remember and am thinking that it is more a traditional thing, than a formally created power thing, which is a significant difference with TPA.

In fact, the more I think about this (and blogged on it a minute ago), there is an important distinction to be made between TPA and treaty-making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Executive Agreements are even less powerful than Trade Agreements, given that they expire with the given administration.</p>
<p>Do you know if there is specific legislative authority for EAs?  I am trying to remember and am thinking that it is more a traditional thing, than a formally created power thing, which is a significant difference with TPA.</p>
<p>In fact, the more I think about this (and blogged on it a minute ago), there is an important distinction to be made between TPA and treaty-making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/filibusters_redux/comment-page-1/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1931#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t know the history of executive agreements, although I&#039;m pretty sure they&#039;ve been around since the days when Founding Fathers were still in the White House.  

And I had always missed the two house/simple majority aspect of Fast Track; I thought the deal was that it was just non-amendable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don't know the history of executive agreements, although I'm pretty sure they've been around since the days when Founding Fathers were still in the White House.  </p>
<p>And I had always missed the two house/simple majority aspect of Fast Track; I thought the deal was that it was just non-amendable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/filibusters_redux/comment-page-1/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1931#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TPA v. Treaties&lt;/strong&gt;
Bret Marston, and in response James Joyner, have commented on the issue of Trade Promotion Authority (once known as &quot;Fast Track&quot;) in the context of current Senate filibusters of President Bush&#039;s Appeals Court nominees. The main issue being Bret&#039;s conte...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TPA v. Treaties</strong><br />
Bret Marston, and in response James Joyner, have commented on the issue of Trade Promotion Authority (once known as "Fast Track") in the context of current Senate filibusters of President Bush's Appeals Court nominees. The main issue being Bret's conte...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
