Comments on: Star Wars: Revenge Of The Sith Not for Kids

By: princessslave girl

princessslave girl — Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:25:15 +0000

will i went to see star wars in the theater when i was only four years old. i know alot of people are concerned about rots being to voilent for children under 13 but this the last movie ever that finishes the saga so i feel that adults and kids of all ages should go to movie on opening day. lol there is more violence on local tv channels that kids have very easy axcess on the daily basis. so let the force be with ya.

By: awaku

awaku — Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:29:05 +0000

look at the bigger picture bro, you dont even know what the entire story is about.., keep to watching the "notebook" and let the fans be the judge. oh "jedis" is Jedi FYI

By: Tim

Tim — Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:29:17 +0000

The first 2 movies are made for kids because they're about a kid. Think about it. They find Anakin on Tattoine and he's what, 9, maybe? It's not going to be dark, it's the beginning of his story getting to be evil. The second movie, in comparison with the first movie, has a lot more action and fight scenes. The chase with Zem, the fight with Jango Fett, and even the final battle at the end. In the second movie you just start to see Anakin turning to the dark side. He's a teenager. A know-it-all, do-it-all-himself type of guy that doesnt want help from anybody. Revenge of the Sith is the end of Anakins struggle with who he is. He makes a decision to turn to the dark side and kill a lot of people so of course it's going to be a dark movie. You can't look at the first two movies by themselves because they're part of a much bigger picture.

By: Tim

Tim — Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:28:41 +0000

By: Inziladun

Inziladun — Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:03:52 +0000

Yes... Han shot first, and there is no Force... only Medichlorians.

By: The Daily Brief: Just Because No One Understands You Doesn't Mean You're An Artist!

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:37:52 +0000

Okay, Now I'm just Pissed First I was annoyed at what "genius" George Lucas had done to Star Wars. Jar-Jar was NOT a picture I needed added to the freak show that plays in my mind. Episode II gave us a crystal-meth-fueled whirling dirvish of a Yoda, that was good for about ...

By: Myopist

Myopist — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:10:08 +0000

"Please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please let it not suck."

Ugh?

It's going to suck. It's mostly going to suck because by now we're all ready to root for the Empire, because the Empire at least:

1). Has a plan.
2). Has a clue.

and

3). Has a grip.

Plus, if there's any mercy and/or justice in this fallen world, Jar-Jar Binks will be decapitated onscreen. At the very least Anakin will be thrown into some sort of corrosive substance, albeit one unlikely to be as corrosive as my ill-will towards Lucas at the way he set forth to thoroughly ruin my enjoyment of every damn film in the series.

HANS SHOT FIRST, DAMN YOUR EYES.

By: Crimsonsplat

Crimsonsplat — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:19:19 +0000

I'm of an age that saw Episode IV before it was Episode IV. In the theater, first run. Old enough to remember a movie named _*Revenge* of the Jedi_.

And old enough to look back and say "And this is the instant Lucas sold out and the movies began to royally suck," at the point where the first ewok appears.

By: Charlie on the Pennsylvania Turnpike

Charlie on the Pennsylvania Turnpike — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:38:58 +0000

What made the original installments so good was the impression they were classic Western's made space aged. I saw Episode I and promptly nodded off. Hadn't bothered with II, and am doubtful about III. I am of the age that remembers Lucas' prediction of his 'triology of tirlogies'. It was long announced there won't be 3 more installments, and judging by the latest ones, that's not a bad thing.

By: Jeff Paxson

Jeff Paxson — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:56:45 +0000

I have to disagree with Scott...my kids (7 and 8 year old boys) love IV, V, and VI. In fact, they liked them better than I or II. I think it's just that a good story trumps visual effects for that age...and the original trilogy was, except for the ewoks, a good story. Maybe Scott meant older "kids"...a better point if we're talking about teenagers.

By: JackLewis.net

JackLewis.net — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:33:36 +0000

Make money by running off customers
I was really looking forward to the next installment of the Star Trek saga. Yes, the last one was a...

By: ninme

ninme — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:08:47 +0000

Poor Star Wars
Outside the Beltway - Star Wars: Revenge Of The Sith Not for Kids It appears as if George Lucas’ strategy to destroy the Star Wars franchise he built 30 years ago is nearing completion. The prequel trilogy began with a...

By: Secure Liberty

Secure Liberty — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:57:26 +0000

Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
Well, I'm not sure what to expect after the last two. It seems that Lucas has made a darker film this time, with less appeal to kids. Some have even said it is unsuitable for children. (H/T Outside The Beltway) The final, long-awaited Star Wars mov...

By: B. Minich, PI

B. Minich, PI — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:19:56 +0000

Hmmmm . . . in a culture where Harry Potter gets away with PG (right?), Ep III can't be much worse. *shrug*

By: Our Life

Our Life — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:20:51 +0000

Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith Not For Kids
BBC is covering the possible rating of the last Star Wars movie: The sixth and final Star Wars movie may not be suitable for young children, film-maker George Lucas has said. [...] "I don't think I would take a five...