<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.5 Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:37:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William d'Inger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1081616</link>
		<dc:creator>William d'Inger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1081616</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up. I have written several compute intensive JavaScript applications (like great circle navigation) and have developed my own benchmarks. Firefox v3.5 ran my base benchmark an astounding 3.76 times faster than v3.0. Of course that&#039;s for a specialized application, so I suspect the numbers will be lower for general purpose stuff.

As far as I know, Chrome isn&#039;t available for Macs yet (or at least it hasn&#039;t been around long enough for me to trust it). I&#039;d like to give it a whirl someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up. I have written several compute intensive JavaScript applications (like great circle navigation) and have developed my own benchmarks. Firefox v3.5 ran my base benchmark an astounding 3.76 times faster than v3.0. Of course that's for a specialized application, so I suspect the numbers will be lower for general purpose stuff.</p>
<p>As far as I know, Chrome isn't available for Macs yet (or at least it hasn't been around long enough for me to trust it). I'd like to give it a whirl someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080909</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080909</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m annoyed by the fact that it is incompatible with Norton Toolbar 3.5 right now, but apparently Symantec is really trying to get a fix going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm annoyed by the fact that it is incompatible with Norton Toolbar 3.5 right now, but apparently Symantec is really trying to get a fix going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3.5 Available &#124; Tim's Tech Rant</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080697</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3.5 Available &#124; Tim's Tech Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080697</guid>
		<description>[...]  Firefox 3.5 Available  (outsidethebeltway.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Firefox 3.5 Available  (outsidethebeltway.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080144</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080144</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;UPDATE: It’s both shrewd and creepy that a certain company that does no evil is filling the ad slots on this page with promotions for its own, competing browser.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I didn&#039;t realize you had adz on your site.  One of the advantages of using Firefox with the advertizement bloocking extension!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>UPDATE: It&rsquo;s both shrewd and creepy that a certain company that does no evil is filling the ad slots on this page with promotions for its own, competing browser.</p></blockquote>
<p>I didn't realize you had adz on your site.  One of the advantages of using Firefox with the advertizement bloocking extension!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080138</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080138</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;UPDATE: It’s both shrewd and creepy that a certain company that does no evil is filling the ad slots on this page with promotions for its own, competing browser.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I didn&#039;t realize you had ads on your site--one of the advantages of running Firefox with the AdBlock extension (something that Chrome does not have, by the way)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>UPDATE: It&rsquo;s both shrewd and creepy that a certain company that does no evil is filling the ad slots on this page with promotions for its own, competing browser.</p></blockquote>
<p>I didn't realize you had ads on your site--one of the advantages of running Firefox with the AdBlock extension (something that Chrome does not have, by the way)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080076</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080076</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;View/toolbars/customize will allow you to add all sorts of buttons, James. I am running 3.0.11 and have the &quot;new window&quot; button.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Once upon a time, I tweaked apps like crazy. Now, I pretty much treat my computer as an appliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>View/toolbars/customize will allow you to add all sorts of buttons, James. I am running 3.0.11 and have the "new window" button.</p></blockquote>
<p>Once upon a time, I tweaked apps like crazy. Now, I pretty much treat my computer as an appliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080061</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080061</guid>
		<description>View/toolbars/customize will allow you to add all sorts of buttons, James.  I am running 3.0.11 and have the &quot;new window&quot; button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>View/toolbars/customize will allow you to add all sorts of buttons, James.  I am running 3.0.11 and have the "new window" button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080034</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080034</guid>
		<description>Oh, I think I get it...that&#039;s for the wifi folks, no? In case they&#039;re roaming about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I think I get it...that's for the wifi folks, no? In case they're roaming about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080032</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080032</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;geolocation technology that can let Web sites know where you are&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And that&#039;s a good thing because? (And, anyway, they can do that now with your ip address. Which I&#039;m not crazy about.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>geolocation technology that can let Web sites know where you are</p></blockquote>
<p>And that's a good thing because? (And, anyway, they can do that now with your ip address. Which I'm not crazy about.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Florack</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080009</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Florack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080009</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;One thing I noticed immediately is a + button next to the rightmost open tab which instantly opens a new, blank page.  That’s handy.  My workaround had been to open a random new tab from the toolbar.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Keystroke: Ctrl-T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>One thing I noticed immediately is a + button next to the rightmost open tab which instantly opens a new, blank page.  That&rsquo;s handy.  My workaround had been to open a random new tab from the toolbar.</p></blockquote>
<p>Keystroke: Ctrl-T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFire</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/firefox_35_available/comment-page-1/#comment-1080005</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38702#comment-1080005</guid>
		<description>Odd you&#039;re having problem.  I click on check update in the help pull down menu, and it went fairly smoothly.  Don&#039;t know what else changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd you're having problem.  I click on check update in the help pull down menu, and it went fairly smoothly.  Don't know what else changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
