In psycho GOP land, Bill Clinton got a blow job, so Bush can therefore invade non-threatening countries, bomb innocent women and children, torture whomever he wants, subvert the Constitution, employ traitors, perverts and adulterers - while preaching morality, etc. etc.

Maybe they haven't noticed that Bush's poll numbers are down in the 20's. Grow up you freakin' idiots.

I suppose that depends on how you qualify the role of some of the females he was associating with.

I think it depends more on how you define prostitution. As I (and the rest of reasonable society) define it as a criminal offense, absent specific allegations your argument has zero merit.

We see him going specifically after conservative targets, alone.

He goes after the targets who demonize him. So what's your point? If they weren't hypocrites, they'd have nothing to fear from Mr. Flynt.

Are you suggesting that Bill Clinton patronized prostitutes? I believe that might be precariously close to defamatory speech...

I suppose that depends on how you qualify the role of some of the females he was associating with. Selling one's self for the purpose of being near power, or celebrity, is still selling one's self.

Even absent that point, it still ends up being a morally reprehensible act, and if morality was what Mr. Flynt was all about, we'd see in complaining about that, too. However, we do not. We see him going specifically after conservative targets, alone.

As I recall, he was an avid supporter of Bill Clinton for both of his elections.

Are you suggesting that Bill Clinton patronized prostitutes? I believe that might be precariously close to defamatory speech...

Gary Hart?

Not really. In that particular case, he basically buried them to come up with something on him. Moral: Slap their faces a few times, and they might respond. That's all Hart was ever about.

Somebody has to provide the information about these scandals. Are we better off knowing about Bill Clinton's escapades with Monica Lewinski?

Perhaps not. At the same time you may rest assured that it won't be Larry Flynt making the revelation about Bill Clinton. Wherein, perhaps, lies the point, James. The attacks, clearly, are politically motivated. Case in point:

Seriously, if he was promoting his own lifestyle, why wouldn't he support those politicians who patronize prostitutes?

As I recall, he was an avid supporter of Bill Clinton for both of his elections.

A public service, generally speaking, is not provided with a partisan goal in mind. Forgive me if I don't regard it as such.

1. When will this be applied to Al Gore's lack of personal environmentalist standards?
2. From where does the assumption come that because someone doesn't preach at the public about how immoral it is and demand that it live by an arbitrary standard imposed by the preacher, that they lack standards?

Pug, the funny thing with liberal is that they stand one sided for their donkeypoop, from the the great plies of it that you believe in and preach, your thinking on this should be, that he was a victim
of his own misguided belief in a God given morality, and its not his fault cause some Zealous bigot must have brain washed him when he was young, he was absolutely innocent because he did not know what he was standing for because he does not know right form wrong.

Interesting. Do you write Blogs4Brownback too?

where is the compassion that you liberals say that only you have, why do you not stand up for one of your favorite rights in all situations, innocence by ignorance, where is your bleeding heart for all and not just some who have been harmed by the vile institutions of the most evil of religions, Christianity, in this one????

just as I thought, an ideology of posers!!!!

Why do you support covering up crimes?

The "nice try" was your attempt to imPUGn my credibility by associating me with Republicans, AKA here as "Conservatives".[grinz]...

Of course I have a right to be insulted by your remark, but at least you didn't accuse me of worse, like being a democrat or a Liberal, with all the baggage those slanderous terms carry! [lol]
BTW; By your standards, I really should be called a "chauvinist reactionary"!![lol]
Another gross mischaracterization, but at least it would fit your innate sense of superiority!